BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17878768)

  • 1. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
    Seel RT; Wright G; Wallace T; Newman S; Dennis L
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2007; 22(5):267-77. PubMed ID: 17878768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.
    Hall KM; Bushnik T; Lakisic-Kazazic B; Wright J; Cantagallo A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 82(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 11245760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury in active duty military personnel and veterans: Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center randomized controlled trial of two rehabilitation approaches.
    Vanderploeg RD; Schwab K; Walker WC; Fraser JA; Sigford BJ; Date ES; Scott SG; Curtiss G; Salazar AM; Warden DL;
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 89(12):2227-38. PubMed ID: 19061734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury.
    Gray DS; Burnham RS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Nov; 81(11):1447-56. PubMed ID: 11083347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The functional assessment measure (FAM) in closed traumatic brain injury outpatients: a Rasch-based psychometric study.
    Tesio L; Cantagallo A
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):79-96. PubMed ID: 9661733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay.
    Frankel JE; Marwitz JH; Cifu DX; Kreutzer JS; Englander J; Rosenthal M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 16401439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury.
    Hanks RA; Millis SR; Ricker JH; Giacino JT; Nakese-Richardson R; Frol AB; Novack TA; Kalmar K; Sherer M; Gordon WA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 18452745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and responsiveness of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury.
    Soo C; Tate RL; Aird V; Allaous J; Browne S; Carr B; Coulston C; Diffley L; Gurka J; Hummell J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 20510982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time to rehabilitation admission and associated outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Kunik CL; Flowers L; Kazanjian T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 87(12):1590-6. PubMed ID: 17141638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury.
    Toschlog EA; MacElligot J; Sagraves SG; Schenarts PJ; Bard MR; Goettler CE; Rotondo MF; Swanson MS
    Am Surg; 2003 Jun; 69(6):491-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 12852506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
    Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome after traumatic brain injury: effects of aging on recovery.
    Testa JA; Malec JF; Moessner AM; Brown AW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1815-23. PubMed ID: 16181948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spinal cord injury and co-occurring traumatic brain injury: assessment and incidence.
    Macciocchi S; Seel RT; Thompson N; Byams R; Bowman B
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1350-7. PubMed ID: 18586138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing functional status and community integration in severe penetrating and motor vehicle-related brain injuries.
    Wertheimer JC; Hanks RA; Hasenau DL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 89(10):1983-90. PubMed ID: 18929027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of intensive outpatient neuro-rehabilitation outcomes using FIM+FAM(UK).
    Wilson FC; Wheatley-Smith L; Downes C
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 24(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19597276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional oral intake and time to reach unrestricted dieting for patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Hansen TS; Engberg AW; Larsen K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 89(8):1556-62. PubMed ID: 18674990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traumatic brain injury in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and economic consequences.
    Bradbury CL; Wodchis WP; Mikulis DJ; Pano EG; Hitzig SL; McGillivray CF; Ahmad FN; Craven BC; Green RE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 89(12 Suppl):S77-84. PubMed ID: 19081445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A fate worse than death? Long-term outcome of trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit.
    Livingston DH; Tripp T; Biggs C; Lavery RF
    J Trauma; 2009 Aug; 67(2):341-8; discussion 348-9. PubMed ID: 19667888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive outcomes in traumatic brain injury-vegetative state: patients treated with bromocriptine.
    Passler MA; Riggs RV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 82(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11245751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of delay in rehabilitation on outcome of severe traumatic brain injury.
    Tepas JJ; Leaphart CL; Pieper P; Beaulieu CL; Spierre LR; Tuten JD; Celso BG
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Feb; 44(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 19231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.