422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879327)
1. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
Hirotsu C
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
Sankoh AJ
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.
Goeman JJ; Solari A; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2117-25. PubMed ID: 20658478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On non-inferiority margin and statistical tests in active control trials.
Chow SC; Shao J
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1101-13. PubMed ID: 16345042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo.
Pigeot I; Schäfer J; Röhmel J; Hauschke D
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 12627407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-parametric assessment of non-inferiority with censored data.
Freitag G; Lange S; Munk A
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1201-17. PubMed ID: 16345041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TACT method for non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 12520559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some fundamental issues with non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials.
James Hung HM; Wang SJ; Tsong Y; Lawrence J; O'Neil RT
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 12520558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
Carroll KJ
Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology.
Rothmann M; Li N; Chen G; Chi GY; Temple R; Tsou HH
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):239-64. PubMed ID: 12520560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing non-inferiority: a combination approach.
Gao P; Ware JH
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 17575568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
Tsong Y; Zhang JJ
Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):62-74; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Issues on the selection of non-inferiority margin in clinical trials.
Hou Y; Wu XY; Li K
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 19302756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
Laster LL; Johnson MF
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
Christensen E
J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-formulating non-inferiority trials as superiority trials: The case of binary outcomes.
Durkalski VL; Berger VW
Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 19197960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials].
Nicolas P; Tod M; Petitjean O
Therapie; 1993; 48(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8356540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
