These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879705)

  • 1. [The influence of camera-to-object distance and focal length on the representation of faces].
    Verhoff MA; Witzel C; Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K
    Arch Kriminol; 2007; 220(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 17879705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ideal subject distance for passport pictures.
    Verhoff MA; Witzel C; Kreutz K; Ramsthaler F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 178(2-3):153-6. PubMed ID: 18450396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2D/3D image (facial) comparison using camera matching.
    Goos MI; Alberink IB; Ruifrok AC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Nov; 163(1-2):10-7. PubMed ID: 16337353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An improved technique to enable 2-dimensional shoe sole impression evidence to be photographically recorded "to scale".
    Hall BR; Nolan AM
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jul; 39(4):1094-9. PubMed ID: 8064268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs.
    Kleinberg KF; Vanezis P; Burton AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):779-83. PubMed ID: 17524059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Focal Length Affects Depicted Shape and Perception of Facial Images.
    Třebický V; Fialová J; Kleisner K; Havlíček J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149313. PubMed ID: 26894832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation into the use of photoanthropometry in facial image comparison.
    Moreton R; Morley J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):231-7. PubMed ID: 21802228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological considerations in the determination of projected frontal area in cyclists.
    Olds T; Olive S
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Apr; 17(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 10373042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying Facial Distortion in Modern Digital Photography.
    Derakhshan A; Gadkaree SK; Barbarite ER; Lindeborg MM; Bhama PK; Shaye DA
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Mar; 134(3):1234-1238. PubMed ID: 37543968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Head proportion and shape of the head of children between 2 and 7 years--results of a longitudinal study.
    Schüler G
    Anthropol Anz; 2007 Jun; 65(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 17711152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative optics: the control of perspective in comparative photography.
    McShane RH; Clayton J; Smith T
    Ann Plast Surg; 1978 Sep; 1(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 727683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces.
    Jaquet E; Rhodes G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 18248142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superimposition and projective transformation of 3D object.
    Eliásová H; Krsek P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):146-53. PubMed ID: 16884880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing the right clinical camera. Part I.
    Fan PP
    Oral Health; 1998 Apr; 88(4):67-9, 71, 73 passim. PubMed ID: 9656932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized portrait photography for dental patients.
    Claman L; Patton D; Rashid R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 2403072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniform photographic documentation in facial plastic surgery.
    Thomas JR; Tardy ME; Przekop H
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1980 May; 13(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 7393578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning faces from photographs.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 18248141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.