223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879779)
1. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
Lin PJ
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Operation logic and functionality of automatic dose rate and image quality control of conventional fluoroscopy.
Lin PJ
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1486-93. PubMed ID: 19544764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Angiographic System with Spectral Shaping Filter].
Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30662028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient Radiation Dose Reduction during Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a Novel X-Ray Imaging Platform.
Kohlbrenner R; Kolli KP; Taylor AG; Kohi MP; Fidelman N; LaBerge JM; Kerlan RK; Agarwal VK; Lehrman ED; Nanavati S; Avrin DE; Gould R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1331-8. PubMed ID: 26212556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New automated fluoroscopic systems for pediatric applications.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; So JC; Dutta AK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):88-105. PubMed ID: 16421503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Where should we measure the entrance air kerma rate during acceptance testing of the automatic dose control of a fluoroscopic system?
Fukuda A; Miyati T; Matsubara K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 23413079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment.
Belanger B; Boudry J
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16862403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy.
Gagne RM; Quinn PW; Jennings RJ
Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 8164575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two angiographic systems in paediatric interventional cardiology.
Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Aguirre D; Riquelme N; Guarda E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):250-3. PubMed ID: 25843951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of flat-panel fluoroscopic equipment variables on cardiac radiation doses.
Nickoloff EL; Lu ZF; Dutta A; So J; Balter S; Moses J
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 17216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
