These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879779)

  • 21. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
    Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).
    Kalender WA; Kyriakou Y
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2767-79. PubMed ID: 17587058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does a flat panel detector reduce the patient radiation dose in interventional cardiology?
    Dragusin O; Breisch R; Bokou C; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):266-70. PubMed ID: 20139267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review and investigation of automatic brightness/dose rate control logic of fluoroscopic imaging systems in cardiovascular interventional angiography.
    Lin PP; Goode AR; Corwin FD
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Mar; 15(1):6-24. PubMed ID: 35050444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Approaches to interventional fluoroscopic dose curves.
    Wunderle KA; Rakowski JT; Dong FF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):342-352. PubMed ID: 26894349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flat detectors and their clinical applications.
    Spahn M
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1934-47. PubMed ID: 15806363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
    Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dose evaluation of a flat-panel detector system].
    Seguchi S; Ishikawa Y; Mizuno S; Saijou T; Nagao T; Nakamura A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Nov; 59(11):1438-43. PubMed ID: 14983132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiographic and fluoroscopic X-ray systems: Quality control of the X-ray tube and automatic exposure control using theoretical spectra to determine air kerma and dose to a homogenous phantom.
    Konst B; Nøtthellen J; Bilet E; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 22(8):204-218. PubMed ID: 34196461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Phantom Study and a Retrospective Clinical Analysis to Investigate the Impact of a New Image Processing Technology on Radiation Dose and Image Quality during Hepatic Embolization.
    Dave JK; Eschelman DJ; Wasserman JR; Gonsalves CF; Gingold EL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 26948994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
    Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating Fluoroscopic Peak Skin Dose Using Manual Calculations.
    Berry KE
    Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):649-653. PubMed ID: 29697515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.
    Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choice of phantom material and test protocols to determine radiation exposure rates for fluoroscopy.
    Anderson JA; Wang J; Clarke GD
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1033-42. PubMed ID: 10903693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of the practical aspects of an additional 0.1 mm copper x-ray spectral filter for cine acquisition mode imaging in a clinical care setting.
    Fetterly KA
    Health Phys; 2010 Nov; 99(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 20938232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit.
    Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Desmet W; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.