BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879796)

  • 1. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
    Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
    Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
    Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
    Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the suitability of ultrathin detectors for absorbed dose assessment in the presence of high-density heterogeneities.
    Bueno M; Carrasco P; Jornet N; Muñoz-Montplet C; Duch MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081710. PubMed ID: 25086520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
    Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a phantom to validate high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning systems with heterogeneous algorithms.
    Moura ES; Micka JA; Hammer CG; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA; Rostelato ME; Zeituni CA
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1566-74. PubMed ID: 25832047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry audit of radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
    Bulski W; Chełmiński K; Rostkowska J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):472-6. PubMed ID: 25848119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.
    Paudel MR; Kim A; Sarfehnia A; Ahmad SB; Beachey DJ; Sahgal A; Keller BM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):230-241. PubMed ID: 27929496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
    Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
    Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
    Jones AO; Das IJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
    Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
    Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
    Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation.
    Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.