These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879801)

  • 41. Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms.
    Zhang Y; Pham B; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 May; 23(5):613-32. PubMed ID: 15147014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Engstrom M; Fan J; Nafziger J; Lubin J; Dallas WJ
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Sep; 10(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 13678092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mass detection on mammograms: influence of signal shape uncertainty on human and model observers.
    Castella C; Eckstein MP; Abbey CK; Kinkel K; Verdun FR; Saunders RS; Samei E; Bochud FO
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Feb; 26(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 19183697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.
    Gur D; Bandos AI; King JL; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4404-9. PubMed ID: 18975686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
    Segui JA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
    Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the impact of tube current modulation on lesion detectability using model observers.
    Wunderlich A; Noo F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2705-8. PubMed ID: 19163263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance.
    Paquerault S; Yarusso LM; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 15487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information.
    Freixenet J; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Pont J; Pérez E; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1840-53. PubMed ID: 18561659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.
    Abdullah AK; Kelly J; Thompson JD; Mercer CE; Aspin R; Hogg P
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20160871. PubMed ID: 28508724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.