These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879801)

  • 61. Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 15766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Predicting error in detecting mammographic masses among radiology trainees using statistical models based on BI-RADS features.
    Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Kuzmiak CM; Kim C; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031909. PubMed ID: 24593727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection.
    Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Design of a model observer to evaluate calcification detectability in breast tomosynthesis and application to smoothing prior optimization.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6577. PubMed ID: 27908152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor.
    Krupinski E; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Feb; 10(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 12583567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.
    Burgess AE; Jacobson FL; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):419-37. PubMed ID: 11339738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Investigation of reduction of exposure dose in digital mammography: relationship between exposure dose and image processing].
    Fujimura Y; Nishiyama H; Masumoto T; Kono S; Kitagawa Y; Ikeda T; Furukawa T; Ishida T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Feb; 64(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 18311032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Estimating three-class ideal observer decision variables for computerized detection and classification of mammographic mass lesions.
    Edwards DC; Lan L; Metz CE; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 14761024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
    Abbey CK; Gallas BD; Boone JM; Niklason LT; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Samuelson FW
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 24594418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Simulating the mammographic appearance of circumscribed lesions.
    Skiadopoulos S; Costaridou L; Kalogeropoulou CP; Likaki E; Livos L; Panayiotakis G
    Eur Radiol; 2003 May; 13(5):1137-47. PubMed ID: 12695838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Model observer design for multi-signal detection in the presence of anatomical noise.
    Wen G; Markey MK; Park S
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1396-1415. PubMed ID: 28114105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Human linear template with mammographic backgrounds estimated with a genetic algorithm.
    Castella C; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP; Verdun FR; Kinkel K; Bochud FO
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B1-12. PubMed ID: 18059902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
    Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma.
    Costaridou L; Skiadopoulos S; Sakellaropoulos P; Likaki E; Kalogeropoulou CP; Panayiotakis G
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1615-22. PubMed ID: 15702336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
    Chakraborty DP
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Search for lesions in mammograms: statistical characterization of observer responses.
    Bochud FO; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 14761017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a signal-detection study.
    Hesterman JY; Kupinski MA; Clarkson E; Barrett HH
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3034-44. PubMed ID: 17822011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Channelized-ideal observer using Laguerre-Gauss channels in detection tasks involving non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds and a Gaussian signal.
    Park S; Barrett HH; Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Myers KJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B136-50. PubMed ID: 18059906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Shannon information and ROC analysis in imaging.
    Clarkson E; Cushing JB
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1288-301. PubMed ID: 26367158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.