These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879803)

  • 21. Comparison of two methods to compute the absorbed dose to water for photon beams.
    Gardner JK; Siebers JV; Kawrakow I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N439-47. PubMed ID: 17881794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microdosimetry distributions for 40-200 MeV protons.
    Palajová Z; Spurný F; Davídková M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 16782987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of the focal spot size and shape for a medical linear accelerator by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Wang LL; Leszczynski K
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 17388165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of parameters for a multiple-source model of megavoltage photon beams using optimization methods.
    Tillikainen L; Siljamäki S; Helminen H; Alakuijala J; Pyyry J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1441-67. PubMed ID: 17301464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Photon pencil kernel parameterisation based on beam quality index.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 16515812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm.
    Toutaoui A; Ait chikh S; Khelassi-Toutaoui N; Hattali B
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):833-7. PubMed ID: 24947967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The grid-dose-spreading algorithm for dose distribution calculation in heavy charged particle radiotherapy.
    Kanematsu N; Yonai S; Ishizaki A
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):602-7. PubMed ID: 18383681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of calculation precision of photon dose between the two algorithms for the situation with air cavity and small fields].
    Yang Z; Hu Y; Wei R
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 22404011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo source model for photon beam radiotherapy: photon source characteristics.
    Fix MK; Keall PJ; Dawson K; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3106-21. PubMed ID: 15587664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improvement of radiological penumbra using intermediate energy photons (IEP) for stereotactic radiosurgery.
    O'Malley L; Pignol JP; Beachey DJ; Keller BM; Presutti J; Sharpe M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2537-48. PubMed ID: 16675868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using a photon phase-space source for convolution/superposition dose calculations in radiation therapy.
    Naqvi SA; D'Souza WD; Earl MA; Ye SJ; Shih R; Li XA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4111-24. PubMed ID: 16177534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of the different uncertainty models in dose expected volume histogram computation.
    Cutanda Henríquez F; Vargas Castrillón S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Sep; 31(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 18946977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
    Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
    Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison between anisotropic analytical and multigrid superposition dose calculation algorithms in radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Wu VW; Tse TK; Ho CL; Yeung EC
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 23535249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of anisotropy corrections on the dynamic dose calculations in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.
    Cho SH; Muller-Runkel R
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jul; 39(7):1181-8. PubMed ID: 15552105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regularization of inverse planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Chvetsov AV; Calvetti D; Sohn JW; Kinsella TJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 15789597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.