These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17879826)

  • 21. The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions.
    Hermann M; Le Ray C; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):241.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25108139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Elective Induction of Labor: What is the Impact?
    Little SE
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2017 Dec; 44(4):601-614. PubMed ID: 29078942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Elective cesarean section and induction and their impact on late preterm births.
    Fuchs K; Wapner R
    Clin Perinatol; 2006 Dec; 33(4):793-801; abstract viii. PubMed ID: 17148005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies.
    Rayburn WF; Zhang J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jul; 100(1):164-7. PubMed ID: 12100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.
    Sinkey RG; Lacevic J; Reljic T; Hozo I; Gibson KS; Odibo AO; Djulbegovic B; Lockwood CJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193169. PubMed ID: 29694344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?
    Moore J; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 26(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 22843006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Elective induction of labor symposium: nomenclature, research methodological issues, and outcomes.
    Darney BG; Caughey AB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 57(2):343-62. PubMed ID: 24662771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.
    Kalish RB; McCullough L; Gupta M; Thaler HT; Chervenak FA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1137-41. PubMed ID: 15172844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.
    Baud D; Rouiller S; Hohlfeld P; Tolsa JF; Vial Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(16):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23581489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elective preterm birth.
    Simpson KR
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2006; 31(1):68. PubMed ID: 16371837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Failed induction of labor.
    Schoen C; Navathe R
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 26341068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.
    Yamasato K; Tsai PS; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
    Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Dec; 75(12):367-372. PubMed ID: 27980880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are there adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor when there is no well-accepted indication?
    Harwood MI
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):106. PubMed ID: 11219552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.