These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1788037)
1. Effects of early common features on form perception. Sanocki T Percept Psychophys; 1991 Nov; 50(5):490-7. PubMed ID: 1788037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. Sanocki T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):878-98. PubMed ID: 8409864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination? Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Johnston JC; Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: a reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Lleras A; Enns JT J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 16846278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking. Chen Z; Treisman A Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 19368699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interruption of dot processing by a backward mask. Liss P; Reeves A Perception; 1983; 12(5):513-29. PubMed ID: 6676702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes. Scharlau I Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition. Sanocki T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):924-41. PubMed ID: 1837304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of feature uncertainty on spatial discriminations. Vogels R; Eeckhout H; Orban GA Perception; 1988; 17(5):565-77. PubMed ID: 3249664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events. Carlson KA; Flowers JH Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):460-70. PubMed ID: 8935906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors. Schmidt F; Schmidt T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect. Sumner P Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 18444523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account. Huckauf A; Heller D; Nazir TA Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):177-89. PubMed ID: 10070209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. Frowd C; Bruce V; McIntyre A; Hancock P Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):61-77. PubMed ID: 17319051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of spatial competition between object-level representations of target and mask on object substitution masking. Guest D; Gellatly A; Pilling M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2528-41. PubMed ID: 21850544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]