These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881384)

  • 1. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population stratification bias in the case-only study for gene-environment interactions.
    Wang LY; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 168(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18497429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing population stratification bias: stratum matching is better than exposure.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18619810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robustness of case-control studies of genetic factors to population stratification: magnitude of bias and type I error.
    Khlat M; Cazes MH; Génin E; Guiguet M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1660-4. PubMed ID: 15466984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. II. False-positive rates and their limiting behavior as number of subpopulations increases.
    Gorroochurn P; Hodge SE; Heiman G; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15604563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bounding the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect-modifying potentials.
    Lee WC
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(9):1007-17. PubMed ID: 21472760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVII. Unintentional population stratification in genetic case-control studies].
    Hottenga JJ; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; van Duijn CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jan; 146(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11802331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biased odds ratios from dichotomization of age.
    Chen H; Cohen P; Chen S
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3487-97. PubMed ID: 17066378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator.
    le Cessie S; Debeij J; Rosendaal FR; Cannegieter SC; Vandenbroucke JP
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 22526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studying the joint effects of population stratification and sampling in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lee JY; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20357476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.
    Geneletti S; Richardson S; Best N
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18482997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models.
    Schwartz J; Coull BA
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):539-53. PubMed ID: 14557110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
    Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.