These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881838)

  • 21. Factors affecting the performance of membrane bioreactor for piggery wastewater treatment.
    Kornboonraksa T; Lee SH
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jun; 100(12):2926-32. PubMed ID: 19268579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of UV disinfection and the microbial quality of greywater effluent along a reuse system for toilet flushing.
    Friedler E; Gilboa Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(9):2109-17. PubMed ID: 20172592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sustainable membrane operation design for the treatment of the synthetic coke wastewater in SMBR.
    Zhou Y; Xu ZL; Munib S; Chen GE; Lu Q
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2115-24. PubMed ID: 19844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Practical application of wastewater reuse in tourist resorts.
    Antakyali D; Krampe J; Steinmetz H
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):2051-7. PubMed ID: 18587197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility of the membrane bioreactor process for water reclamation.
    Adham S; Gagliardo P; Boulos L; Oppenheimer J; Trussell R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):203-9. PubMed ID: 11436782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of MBR technology for the improvement of environmental footprint of wastewater treatment.
    Lazarova V; Martin Ruel S; Barillon B; Dauthuille P
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(10):2056-64. PubMed ID: 22949234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Degradation of acetaminophen by Delftia tsuruhatensis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a membrane bioreactor.
    De Gusseme B; Vanhaecke L; Verstraete W; Boon N
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1829-37. PubMed ID: 21167545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal and its modeling for the activated sludge and membrane bioreactor processes.
    Zuthi MF; Guo WS; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():363-74. PubMed ID: 23659759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Graywater treatment technologies and reuse of reclaimed water for toilet flushing.
    Ren X; Zhang Y; Chen H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(28):34653-34663. PubMed ID: 31104237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment and reuse: a success story.
    Ben Aim RM; Semmens MJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12578166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Treatment of wastewater from a toilet for reclamation with a airlift external recirculated membrane bioreactor].
    Xu H; Fan Y
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2003 Mar; 24(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 12800673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries.
    Lazarova V; Levine B; Sack J; Cirelli G; Jeffrey P; Muntau H; Salgot M; Brissaud F
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):25-33. PubMed ID: 11436789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biological black water treatment combined with membrane separation.
    van Voorthuizen E; Zwijnenburg A; van der Meer W; Temmink H
    Water Res; 2008 Oct; 42(16):4334-40. PubMed ID: 18774157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-municipal cooperation for wastewater treatment: case studies from Israel.
    Hophmayer-Tokich S; Kliot N
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Feb; 86(3):554-65. PubMed ID: 17335957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-benefit evaluation of a decentralized water system for wastewater reuse and environmental protection.
    Chen R; Wang XC
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1515-22. PubMed ID: 19403964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhanced biological nutrient removal using MUCT-MBR system.
    Zhang H; Wang X; Xiao J; Yang F; Zhang J
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1048-54. PubMed ID: 18768308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simultaneous removal of organic matter and nitrogen compounds by combining a membrane bioreactor and a membrane biofilm reactor.
    Hasar H
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 May; 100(10):2699-705. PubMed ID: 19186053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.