These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881838)

  • 41. Membrane bioreactors as core technology for water loop closure in a maltery.
    De Wever H; Boënne W; Danau M; Vanderspiegel N; Lambert K; Hardy K; Limbos J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1805-8. PubMed ID: 18547934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of controlling factors on the start-up and operation for partial nitrification in membrane bioreactor.
    Xue Y; Yang F; Liu S; Fu Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1055-60. PubMed ID: 18778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system.
    van Voorthuizen EM; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3657-67. PubMed ID: 16054670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds with membrane processes in wastewater treatment and reuse.
    Wintgens T; Gallenkemper M; Melin T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 15497822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Centralised or decentralised sanitation in Swedish summerhouse areas in transition to permanent living?
    Kärrman E; Erlandsson A; Hellström D; Björlenius B; Tidåker P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):157-64. PubMed ID: 17881849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On-site wastewater technologies in Australia.
    Ho G; Dallas S; Anda M; Mathew K
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(6):81-8. PubMed ID: 11700668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Technology selection and comparative performance of source-separating wastewater management systems in Sweden and The Netherlands.
    Mels A; van Betuw W; Braadbaart O
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):77-85. PubMed ID: 17881840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
    Sarioglu M; Insel G; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
    Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Membrane bioreactor processes: a must for the wastewater treatment plants of the Lagoon of Venice.
    Cecchi F; Innocenti L; Bolzonella D; Pavan P
    Ann Chim; 2003 Apr; 93(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 12817637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Proposing a method for online permeability monitoring in membrane bioreactors.
    Joss A; Böhler M; Wedi D; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 19633393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management.
    Gikas P; Tchobanoglous G
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 18079040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilized green algae in batch and semi-continuous cultures treating real wastewater.
    Ruiz-Marin A; Mendoza-Espinosa LG; Stephenson T
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19699635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Membrane technology for sustainable treated wastewater reuse: agricultural, environmental and hydrological considerations.
    Oron G; Gillerman L; Bick A; Manor Y; Buriakovsky N; Hagin J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1383-8. PubMed ID: 18496003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Infrastructure optimisation via MBR retrofit: a design guide.
    Bagg WK
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 19182344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR.
    Abegglen C; Joss A; McArdell CS; Fink G; Schlüsener MP; Ternes TA; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2036-46. PubMed ID: 19269669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Anaerobic treatment as a core technology for energy, nutrients and water recovery from source-separated domestic waste(water).
    Zeeman G; Kujawa K; de Mes T; Hernandez L; de Graaff M; Abu-Ghunmi L; Mels A; Meulman B; Temmink H; Buisman C; van Lier J; Lettinga G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(8):1207-12. PubMed ID: 18469391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biodegradation of wastewater pollutants by activated sludge encapsulated inside calcium-alginate beads in a tubular packed bed reactor.
    Sergio AM; Bustos TY
    Biodegradation; 2009 Sep; 20(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 19340591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.