These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881860)

  • 1. Centralised versus decentralised wastewater systems?
    Orth H
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):259-66. PubMed ID: 17881860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Centralised versus decentralised treatment and disposal options for Küçükçekmece Basin of Istanbul city.
    Eroğlu V; Sarikaya HZ; Yüksel E; Koyuncu I
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):371-8. PubMed ID: 12381014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making decentralised systems viable: a guide to managing decentralised assets and risks.
    Willetts J; Fane S; Mitchell C
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):165-73. PubMed ID: 17881850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual wastewater treatment in Flanders (Belgium).
    Van Tomme I; Pieters J; Verstraete W
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):205-9. PubMed ID: 15954588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wastewater services for small communities.
    Gray S; Booker N
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):65-71. PubMed ID: 12793663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost benefit risk--a concept for management of integrated urban wastewater systems?
    Hauger MB; Rauch W; Linde JJ; Mikkelsen PS
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 11902470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis.
    Molinos-Senante M; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4396-402. PubMed ID: 20667582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian method to estimate proportional payments of users in a wastewater treatment plant.
    Gómez-Muñoz VM; Porta-Gándara MA; Gortari JC
    Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 16364400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Centralised versus decentralised sewage systems: a comparison of pathogen and nutrient loads released into Sydney's drinking water catchments.
    Charles K; Ashbolt N; Ferguson C; Roser D; McGuinness R; Deere D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):53-60. PubMed ID: 14753518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Realisation of the EU Directive 91/271/EWG in Germany technical and economic effects from the perspective of an operator of large wastewater treatment plants.
    Obenaus F; Kraft A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):257-63. PubMed ID: 15553484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systems analysis of urban wastewater systems--two systematic approaches to analyse a complex system.
    Benedetti L; Blumensaat F; Bönisch G; Dirckx G; Jardin N; Krebs P; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):171-9. PubMed ID: 16477984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The situation of sanitary systems in rural areas in the Miyun catchment, China.
    Kröger C; Xu A; Duan S; Zhang B; Eckstädt H; Meissner R
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1178-85. PubMed ID: 22828293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff.
    Ellis JB; Deutsch JC; Mouchel JM; Scholes L; Revitt MD
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():251-60. PubMed ID: 15504512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of Geographic Information Systems and location models to planning of wastewater systems.
    Leitão JP; Matos JS; Gonçalves AB; Matos JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 16206838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated assessment of options for rural wastewater management in Austria.
    Starkl M; Ornetzeder M; Binner E; Holubar P; Pollak M; Dorninger M; Mascher F; Fuerhacker M; Haberl R
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):105-13. PubMed ID: 17881843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measures for structural improvement with regard to the good status of water bodies--estimation of expenditure for a river basin in Germany.
    Grünebaum T; Morgenschweis G; Nusch EA; Schweder H; Weyand M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(10):39-46. PubMed ID: 15137151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of WWTP design and upgrade options: balancing costs and risks of standards' exceedance.
    Benedetti L; Bixio D; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(6-7):371-8. PubMed ID: 17120671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of centralised and decentralised storm water treatment.
    Gruening H; Hoppe H; Messmann S; Giga A
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(11):2598-604. PubMed ID: 22049754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting-up a cost recovery system for the largest wastewater treatment plant in South-East Asia.
    Lønholdt J; Elberg Jørgensen P; O'Hearn D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):123-32. PubMed ID: 16477979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative analysis of methods to represent uncertainty in estimating the cost of constructing wastewater treatment plants.
    Chen HW; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 65(4):383-409. PubMed ID: 12369402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.