556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881886)
1. Comparison of different techniques for stereotactic positron emission tomography imaging.
Novotny J; Nechvil K; Ptacek J; Novotny J; Liscak R
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2008; 86(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 17881886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system.
Okubo M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Shibata T; Kanamori S; Hanaoka K; Hosono M
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 18756360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image-guided surgery].
Gybels J; Suetens P
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 1997; 59(1):35-57; discussion 57-9. PubMed ID: 9221620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simplified method to integrate metabolic images in stereotactic procedures using a PET/CT scanner.
Picozzi P; Rizzo G; Landoni C; Attuati L; Franzin A; Messa C; Ferrari da Passano C; Bettinardi V; Fazio F
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2005; 83(5-6):208-12. PubMed ID: 16534252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.
Cantwell CP; Setty BN; Holalkere N; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 18830103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereotactic imaging quality assurance using an anthropomorphic phantom.
Drzymala RE; Mutic S
Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 10581522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereotactic imaging for radiosurgery: localization accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography compared with computed tomography.
Mori Y; Hayashi N; Iwase M; Yamada M; Takikawa Y; Uchiyama Y; Oda K; Kaii O
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2006; 84(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 16899978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. STIR turbo SE MR imaging vs. coregistered FDG-PET/CT: quantitative and qualitative assessment of N-stage in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Yoshikawa T; Yoshimura M; Ohbayashi C; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17896365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography, positron emission tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of limited pleural mesothelioma: initial results.
Plathow C; Staab A; Schmaehl A; Aschoff P; Zuna I; Pfannenberg C; Peter SH; Eschmann S; Klopp M
Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):737-44. PubMed ID: 18791416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic MRI, dynamic multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), and coregistered 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT: comparative study of capability for management of pulmonary nodules.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Maniwa Y; Nishimura Y; Ohbayashi C; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1284-95. PubMed ID: 18504748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereotactic radiation treatment planning and follow-up studies involving fused multimodality imaging.
Hamm KD; Surber G; Schmücking M; Wurm RE; Aschenbach R; Kleinert G; Niesen A; Baum RP
J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():326-33. PubMed ID: 15537185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.
Fonti R; Salvatore B; Quarantelli M; Sirignano C; Segreto S; Petruzziello F; Catalano L; Liuzzi R; Rotoli B; Del Vecchio S; Pace L; Salvatore M
J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18199607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved attenuation correction via appropriate selection of respiratory-correlated PET data.
Daouk J; Fin L; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 18676054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of MR stereotactic imaging and image co-registration accuracy for 3 different MR scanners by 3 different methods/phantoms: phantom and patient study.
Paštyková V; Novotný J; Veselský T; Urgošík D; Liščák R; Vymazal J
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30544292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and 11C-metomidate positron emission tomography for evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas.
Hennings J; Hellman P; Ahlström H; Sundin A
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 18082990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro study to evaluate the accuracy of stereotactic localization using magnetic resonance imaging by means of the Leksell stereotactic system.
Gliemroth J; Gaebel C; Kehler U; Grande-Nagel I; Missler U; Arnold H
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2002 Mar; 45(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11932816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of activity outside the field of view on image quality for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Secco C; Della Monica P; Leva L; Sacchetti G; Inglese E; Brambilla M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5861-72. PubMed ID: 19759405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multimodal imaging approaches: PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Pichler BJ; Judenhofer MS; Pfannenberg C
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2008; (185 Pt 1):109-32. PubMed ID: 18626801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
