BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17881966)

  • 1. Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients.
    Cole JS; Jackson TR
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Sep; 61(3):539-44; discussion 544. PubMed ID: 17881966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
    Dewing CB; Provencher MT; Riffenburgh RH; Kerr S; Manos RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tubular microsurgery for lumbar discectomies and laminectomies in obese patients: operative results and outcome.
    Tomasino A; Parikh K; Steinberger J; Knopman J; Boockvar J; Härtl R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E664-72. PubMed ID: 19680093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lateral lumbar disc herniations. Technique and results.
    Kogias E; Vougioukas VI; Hubbe U; Halatsch ME
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Jun; 50(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 17882752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases.
    Hoogland T; van den Brekel-Dijkstra K; Schubert M; Miklitz B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 18427318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation.
    Lau D; Han SJ; Lee JG; Lu DC; Chou D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 18(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 20851604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A minimally invasive transmuscular approach to far-lateral L5-S1 level disc herniations: a prospective study.
    Kotil K; Akcetin M; Bilge T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 17414982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive approach to far lateral lumbar disc herniation: technique and clinical results.
    Salame K; Lidar Z
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Apr; 152(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 19834642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications.
    Harrington JF; French P
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Feb; 51(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18306129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy.
    Lee P; Liu JC; Fessler RG
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1667-70. PubMed ID: 21944927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis.
    Ambrossi GL; McGirt MJ; Sciubba DM; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Long DM
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Sep; 65(3):574-8; discussion 578. PubMed ID: 19687703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective evaluation of a 3-blade speculum cannula for minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.
    Chin KR; Michener TA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 16778659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcutaneous lumbar diskectomy for internal disk derangement: a new indication.
    Marks RA
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):885-90. PubMed ID: 11005348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Gold JJ; Acosta FL; Coover C; Ames CP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 18683115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Micro-endoscopic strategies and options for recurrent lumbar disc herniation].
    Zhou Y; Wang J; Chu TW; Li CQ; Zhang ZF; Wang WD; Pan Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 46(19):1475-9. PubMed ID: 19094625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy.
    Huang TJ; Hsu RW; Li YY; Cheng CC
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Mar; 23(2):406-11. PubMed ID: 15734255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients.
    Park P; Upadhyaya C; Garton HJ; Foley KT
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Mar; 62(3):693-9; discussion 693-9. PubMed ID: 18425016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative outcomes of anterior lumbar surgery in obese versus non-obese patients.
    Peng CW; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Nalbandian MM
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 19525153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The translaminar approach to canalicular and cranio-dorsolateral lumbar disc herniations.
    Soldner F; Hoelper BM; Wallenfang T; Behr R
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Apr; 144(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12021876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 18628712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.