These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17882847)

  • 1. Can hospital episode statistics support appraisal and revalidation? Randomised study of physician attitudes.
    Croft GP; Williams JG; Mann RY; Cohen D; Phillips CJ
    Clin Med (Lond); 2007 Aug; 7(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 17882847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
    Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom.
    Archer J; Nunn S; Regan de Bere S
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):994-1000. PubMed ID: 28756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital episode statistics: time for clinicians to get involved?
    Williams JG; Mann RY
    Clin Med (Lond); 2002; 2(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 11871636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual performance review in hospital practice: the development of a framework and evaluation of doctors' attitudes to its value and implementation.
    Trebble TM; Cruickshank L; Hockey PM; Heyworth N; Powell T; Clarke N
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):948-55. PubMed ID: 23748191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmacists' and pharmacy technicians' views on a process of revalidation of pharmacy professionals in Great Britain.
    Potter H; Hassell K; Noyce PR
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 23517656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.
    Archer J; de Bere SR
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 24347152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing medical revalidation in the United Kingdom: Findings about organisational changes and impacts from a survey of Responsible Officers.
    Walshe K; Boyd A; Bryce M; Luscombe K; Tazzyman A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Archer J
    J R Soc Med; 2017 Jan; 110(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28084166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires.
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Walshaw E; Dickens A; Greco M
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying poor performance among doctors in NHS organizations.
    Locke R; Scallan S; Leach C; Rickenbach M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Oct; 19(5):882-8. PubMed ID: 22672355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The GMC is working to improve revalidation.
    Dickson N
    BMJ; 2016 Sep; 354():i4776. PubMed ID: 27629351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.
    Hopayian K; Sherifi J
    Educ Prim Care; 2020 Nov; 31(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 32862790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The RCP Information Laboratory (iLab): breaking the cycle of poor data quality.
    Croft GP; Williams JG
    Clin Med (Lond); 2005; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 15745198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.