227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17883358)
41. Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures.
Fry DE
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2008 Dec; 9(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19216670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Time to pay for quality. CMS will partner with premier in trial project to give financial bonuses to hospitals that deliver the best care.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(26):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 12858633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Just rewards.
Scalise D
Hosp Health Netw; 2006 Mar; 80(3):40-2, 44-6, 2. PubMed ID: 16615644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Pay for performance: a primer for physicians.
Aleali SH
Conn Med; 2006 Jan; 70(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16479876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Quest for quality expands. With new pay rules, providers receptive to changes.
McKinney M
Mod Healthc; 2010 Aug; 40(31):10. PubMed ID: 20726078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Stop payment: CMS prohibits Medicaid payments on "healthcare-acquired conditions".
J AHIMA; 2011 Jul; 82(7):26. PubMed ID: 21848095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Critics call quality report changes impractical, pay updates unfair.
DeJohn P
OR Manager; 2013 Dec; 29(12):25. PubMed ID: 24536107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. IOM's pay-for-performance fix. Plan would trim all payments, pool money for rewards.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Sep; 36(38):8-9. PubMed ID: 17037271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Payments will be based on quality not quantity. CMS plans to stop paying for secondary infections.
Ferman JH
Healthc Exec; 2008; 23(2):52, 54. PubMed ID: 18481636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Do demonstration project's numbers really validate P4P? Observers say other factors play role in improvement.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Feb; 13(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 16544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Technology. EHRs hinder participation in pay for performance.
McKinney M
Hosp Health Netw; 2007 Jul; 81(7):20. PubMed ID: 17691515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Practice now applying the new ASC quality codes.
DeJohn P
OR Manager; 2012 Jun; 28(6):26-8. PubMed ID: 22720519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. How do we get to meaningful use?
Health Manag Technol; 2011 Apr; 32(4):10-2, 14, 16. PubMed ID: 21553619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. CMS reducing pay for HAC.
Colker PT
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2008 Jun; 40(6):56. PubMed ID: 18630104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pay for performance.
Parvin TS
J Miss State Med Assoc; 2005 May; 46(5):141-2. PubMed ID: 15960184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Association of the position of a hospital-acquired condition diagnosis code with changes in medicare severity diagnosis-related group assignment.
Johnson T; Kane JM; Odwazny R; McNutt R
J Hosp Med; 2014 Nov; 9(11):707-13. PubMed ID: 25211355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Operations issues and quality indicators dominate practice challenges in 2011.
MGMA Connex; 2011 Jul; 11(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 21848166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
