BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17883497)

  • 1. Building on IUCN regional red lists to produce lists of species of conservation priority: a model with Irish bees.
    Fitzpatrick U; Murray TE; Paxton RJ; Brown MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 17883497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives.
    Miller RM; Rodríguez JP; Aniskowicz-Fowler T; Bambaradeniya C; Boles R; Eaton MA; Gärdenfors U; Keller V; Molur S; Walker S; Pollock C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):684-96. PubMed ID: 17531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
    Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
    Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List.
    Hayward MW
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1568-76. PubMed ID: 19508675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation.
    Rodrigues AS; Pilgrim JD; Lamoreux JF; Hoffmann M; Brooks TM
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Feb; 21(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 16701477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.
    Schatz GE
    Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 19773196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trend in the status of breeding bird fauna in British Columbia, Canada, based on the IUCN Red List Index method.
    Quayle JF; Ramsay LR; Fraser DF
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17883489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring national and regional declines of rare orchid species with probabilistic models.
    Duffy KJ; Kingston NE; Sayers BA; Roberts DL; Stout JC
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 18798858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.
    Saiz JC; Lozano FD; Gómez MM; Baudet ÁB
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):910-9. PubMed ID: 25580521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The status of chondrichthyan conservation in the Indo-Australasian region.
    White WT; Kyne PM
    J Fish Biol; 2010 Jun; 76(9):2090-117. PubMed ID: 20557656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The conservation and restoration of wild bees.
    Winfree R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May; 1195():169-97. PubMed ID: 20536823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.
    Rønsted N; Walsh SK; Clark M; Edmonds M; Flynn T; Heintzman S; Loomis A; Lorence D; Nagendra U; Nyberg B; Opgenorth M; Weisenberger L; Williams A; Wolkis D; Wood KR; Keir M
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):e13896. PubMed ID: 35146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Not knowing, not recording, not listing: numerous unnoticed mollusk extinctions.
    Régnier C; Fontaine B; Bouchet P
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1214-21. PubMed ID: 19459894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species.
    Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy.
    Maiorano L; Falcucci A; Garton EO; Boitani L
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1433-44. PubMed ID: 18173467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservation priority of global Galliformes species based on phylogenetic diversity.
    Chen Y
    Integr Zool; 2014 Jun; 9(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 24148297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the Red-List Index at a national level for multiple species groups.
    Juslén A; Hyvärinen E; Virtanen LK
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 23330795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.