306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17883615)
1. Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreach.
Carter C
Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(5):225-30. PubMed ID: 17883615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: secondary analysis of a high quality clinical database, the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.
Harrison DA; Welch CA; Eddleston JM
Crit Care; 2006; 10(2):R42. PubMed ID: 16542492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study.
Gao F; Melody T; Daniels DF; Giles S; Fox S
Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R764-70. PubMed ID: 16356225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An audit of compliance with the sepsis resuscitation care bundle in patients admitted to A&E with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Baldwin LN; Smith SA; Fender V; Gisby S; Fraser J
Int Emerg Nurs; 2008 Oct; 16(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 18929343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.
Oliveira CF; Nogueira de Sá FR; Oliveira DS; Gottschald AF; Moura JD; Shibata AR; Troster EJ; Vaz FA; Carcillo JA
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Dec; 24(12):810-5. PubMed ID: 19050666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing?
Cronshaw HL; Daniels R; Bleetman A; Joynes E; Sheils M
Emerg Med J; 2011 Aug; 28(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 20660901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of a bundle of actions to improve adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines at the ED.
De Miguel-Yanes JM; Muñoz-González J; Andueza-Lillo JA; Moyano-Villaseca B; González-Ramallo VJ; Bustamante-Fermosel A
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 27(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 19751623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of a quality improvement bundle in bridging the gap between research and standard care in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.
Nguyen HB; Lynch EL; Mou JA; Lyon K; Wittlake WA; Corbett SW
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Nov; 14(11):1079-86. PubMed ID: 17923718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing an ICU outreach team model.
Wolfe B
Dynamics; 2008; 19(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 18416358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster.
Zambon M; Ceola M; Almeida-de-Castro R; Gullo A; Vincent JL
J Crit Care; 2008 Dec; 23(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 19056006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.
Kang MJ; Shin TG; Jo IJ; Jeon K; Suh GY; Sim MS; Lim SY; Song KJ; Jeong YK
Shock; 2012 Nov; 38(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 23042195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unplanned admission to intensive care after emergency hospitalisation: risk factors and development of a nomogram for individualising risk.
Frost SA; Alexandrou E; Bogdanovski T; Salamonson Y; Parr MJ; Hillman KM
Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 19084319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Australasian resuscitation of sepsis evaluation (ARISE): A multi-centre, prospective, inception cohort study.
Peake SL; Bailey M; Bellomo R; Cameron PA; Cross A; Delaney A; Finfer S; Higgins A; Jones DA; Myburgh JA; Syres GA; Webb SA; Williams P;
Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):811-8. PubMed ID: 19467755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle: impact on mortality.
Castellanos-Ortega Á; Suberviola B; García-Astudillo LA; Ortiz F; Llorca J; Delgado-Rodríguez M
Shock; 2011 Dec; 36(6):542-7. PubMed ID: 21937951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Medical Emergency Team system: a two hospital comparison.
Young L; Donald M; Parr M; Hillman K
Resuscitation; 2008 May; 77(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18241974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of characteristics of admitted emergency department patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU and non-ICU setting.
White NJ; Lindsell CJ; Bassin BS; Venkat A
Emerg Med J; 2008 Feb; 25(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18212141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the intensive care unit: a review of interventions aimed at anticipating and preventing in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.
Naeem N; Montenegro H
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16150531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.
LaRovere JM; Jeffries HE; Sachdeva RC; Rice TB; Wetzel RC; Cooper DS; Bird GL; Ghanayem NS; Checchia PA; Chang AC; Wessel DL
Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():130-6. PubMed ID: 19063783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving sepsis outcomes for acutely ill adults using interdisciplinary order sets.
Winterbottom F; Seoane L; Sundell E; Niazi J; Nash T
Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 21654373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.
Wang Z; Xiong Y; Schorr C; Dellinger RP
J Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 44(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 23332802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
