BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17883910)

  • 1. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Udell IJ
    Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
    Abelson MB; Spitalny L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
    Ohno S;
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Turner D
    Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
    Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
    Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model.
    McLaurin E; Narvekar A; Gomes P; Adewale A; Torkildsen G
    Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 26266427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Sep; 81(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9759796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of once-daily olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution compared to twice-daily olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Abelson MB; Spangler DL; Epstein AB; Mah FS; Crampton HJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2007 Dec; 32(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18085465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
    Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.