BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17883910)

  • 21. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
    Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
    Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
    Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
    Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
    Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
    Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prolonged effectiveness of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Williams JI; Kennedy KS; Gow JA; Torkildsen GL; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 27(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21649522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
    Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, 0.2% on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye.
    Mah FS; O'Brien T; Kim T; Torkildsen G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Feb; 24(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 18167176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Lanier RQ
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):53-6. PubMed ID: 10337434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine versus ketotifen ophthalmic solutions: a double-masked, environmental study of patient preference.
    Leonardi A; Zafirakis P
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1167-73. PubMed ID: 15324519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Loteprednol etabonate suspension 0.2% administered QID compared with olopatadine solution 0.1% administered BID in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients.
    Gong L; Sun X; Qu J; Wang L; Zhang M; Zhang H; Wang L; Gu Y; Elion-Mboussa A; Roy L; Zhu B
    Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1259-1272.e1. PubMed ID: 22627057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preclinical and clinical antiallergic effect of olopatadine 0.2% solution 24 hours after topical ocular administration.
    Vogelson CT; Abelson MB; Pasquine T; Stephens DM; Gamache DA; Gross RD; Robertson SM; Yanni JM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2004; 25(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 15055565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One-visit, randomized, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge study of scanning and imaging technology for objective quantification of eyelid swelling in the allergic reaction with contralateral use of olopatadine and artificial tears.
    Abelson MB; Pratt S; Mussoline JE; Townsend D
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):2070-84. PubMed ID: 12946551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Mortemousque B; Bourcier T; Khairallah M; Messaoud R; Brignole-Baudouin F; Renault D; Rebika H; Brémond-Gignac D;
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24388379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Welch DL
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):60-3. PubMed ID: 11057354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ocular itch relief with alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis: pooled analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials.
    McLaurin EB; Marsico NP; Ackerman SL; Ciolino JB; Williams JM; Villanueva L; Hollander DA
    Adv Ther; 2014 Oct; 31(10):1059-71. PubMed ID: 25260889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-masked environmental study.
    Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Vogelson CT; Pasquine TA; Gross RD; Turner FD; Wells DT; Bergamini MV; Robertson SM
    Clin Ther; 2004 Aug; 26(8):1237-48. PubMed ID: 15476905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
    Leonardi A; Abelson MB
    Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Olopatadine ophthalmic solution adjunctive to loratadine compared with loratadine alone in patients with active seasonal allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.
    Lanier BQ; Gross RD; Marks BB; Cockrum PC; Juniper EF
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Jun; 86(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11428736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the onset and duration of effect of azelastine eye drops (0.05%) versus placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model.
    Friedlaender MH; Harris J; LaVallee N; Russell H; Shilstone J
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2152-7. PubMed ID: 11097587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.