These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17884129)

  • 1. Intercepting free falling objects: better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law.
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Siegler IA
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2982-91. PubMed ID: 17884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion.
    Zago M; McIntyre J; Senot P; Lacquaniti F
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1532-8. PubMed ID: 18499213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues.
    Senot P; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; McIntyre J
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4471-80. PubMed ID: 16120661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intercepting real and simulated falling objects: what is the difference?
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Hecht H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Oct; 184(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19632274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.
    Zago M; Bosco G; Maffei V; Iosa M; Ivanenko YP; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1620-34. PubMed ID: 14627663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: a review of evidence for an internal model of gravity.
    Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Sep; 2(3):S198-208. PubMed ID: 16135884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive, perceptual and action-oriented representations of falling objects.
    Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 15707903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.
    Marinovic W; Plooy AM; Arnold DH
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():73-8. PubMed ID: 22480880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interceptive timing: prior knowledge matters.
    López-Moliner J; Field DT; Wann JP
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):11.1-8. PubMed ID: 17997639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of divided attention on inhibiting the gravity error.
    Hood BM; Wilson A; Dyson S
    Dev Sci; 2006 May; 9(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 16669801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of body posture on long-range time-to-contact estimation.
    Baurès R; Hecht H
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):674-81. PubMed ID: 21936296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.
    Russo M; Cesqui B; La Scaleia B; Ceccarelli F; Maselli A; Moscatelli A; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; d'Avella A
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2421-2434. PubMed ID: 28768737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental imagery of gravitational motion.
    Gravano S; Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():172-191. PubMed ID: 28910670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects.
    Maus GW; Nijhawan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 19485681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus complexity and prospective timing: clues for a parallel process model of time perception.
    Aubry F; Guillaume N; Mogicato G; Bergeret L; Celsis P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 18001688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive feedback in human simulated pendulum balancing.
    Gawthrop P; Loram I; Lakie M
    Biol Cybern; 2009 Aug; 101(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 19588160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects.
    Hosking SG; Crassini B
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1993; 22(6):653-80. PubMed ID: 8255697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Egocentric and allocentric reference frames for catching a falling object.
    Le Séac'h AB; Senot P; McIntyre J
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 201(4):653-62. PubMed ID: 20024651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1990; 19(2):223-39. PubMed ID: 2235289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.