134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17884593)
1. A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses.
Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Glasziou PP; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1002-9. PubMed ID: 17884593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How often can meta-analyses of individual-level data individualize treatment? A meta-epidemiologic study.
Schuit E; Li AH; Ioannidis JPA
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 30445577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trials number, funding support, and intervention type associated with IPDMA data retrieval: a cross-sectional study.
Wu IXY; Xiao F; Wang H; Chen Y; Zhang Z; Lin Y; Tam W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():59-68. PubMed ID: 33098991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of individual patient data meta-analyses on surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ; Rovers MM
Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2():52. PubMed ID: 23826895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in interaction and subgroup-specific effects were observed between randomized and nonrandomized studies in three empirical examples.
Schmidt AF; Rovers MM; Klungel OH; Hoes AW; Knol MJ; Nielen M; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 23510555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 1: analysis methods are often substandard.
Marlin N; Godolphin PJ; Hooper RL; Riley RD; Rogozińska E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():309-318. PubMed ID: 37146661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution and epidemiological characteristics of published individual patient data meta-analyses.
Huang Y; Mao C; Yuan J; Yang Z; Di M; Tam WW; Tang J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100151. PubMed ID: 24945406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Overall Result and Interaction in Aggregate Data Meta-Analysis and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
Huang Y; Tang J; Tam WW; Mao C; Yuan J; Di M; Yang Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Apr; 95(14):e3312. PubMed ID: 27057906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A recursive partitioning approach for subgroup identification in individual patient data meta-analysis.
Mistry D; Stallard N; Underwood M
Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29383818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal.
Gao Y; Liu M; Shi S; Niu M; Li J; Zhang J; Song F; Tian J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():156-167. PubMed ID: 34186194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relevance of individual participant data meta-analysis for studies in obstetrics: delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Broekhuijsen K; Bernardes T; van Baaren GJ; Tajik P; Novikova N; Thangaratinam S; Boers K; Koopmans CM; Wallace K; Shennan AH; Langenveld J; Groen H; van den Berg PP; Mol BW; Franssen MT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():80-3. PubMed ID: 26094180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subgroup Analyses in Reporting of Phase III Clinical Trials in Solid Tumors.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Hu X
J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(15):1697-702. PubMed ID: 25897150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals.
Gabler NB; Duan N; Raneses E; Suttner L; Ciarametaro M; Cooney E; Dubois RW; Halpern SD; Kravitz RL
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):320. PubMed ID: 27423688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical evaluation of age groups and age-subgroup analyses in pediatric randomized trials and pediatric meta-analyses.
Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Seto I; Hamm MP; Thomson D; Hartling L; Ioannidis JP; Curtis S; Constantin E; Batmanabane G; Klassen T; Williams K
Pediatrics; 2012 Jun; 129 Suppl 3():S161-84. PubMed ID: 22661763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment-covariate interaction with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Hattle M; Whittle R; Ensor J
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):718-730. PubMed ID: 37386750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual patient data meta-analyses.
Clarke MJ
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 19(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15749065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to use a subgroup analysis: users' guide to the medical literature.
Sun X; Ioannidis JP; Agoritsas T; Alba AC; Guyatt G
JAMA; 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 24449319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nifedipine maintenance tocolysis and perinatal outcome: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
van Vliet E; Dijkema GH; Schuit E; Heida KY; Roos C; van der Post J; Parry EC; McCowan L; Lyell DJ; El-Sayed YY; Carr DB; Clark AL; Mahdy ZA; Uma M; Sayin NC; Varol GF; Mol BW; Oudijk MA
BJOG; 2016 Oct; 123(11):1753-60. PubMed ID: 27550838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
