BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1099 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17884971)

  • 1. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
    FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
    Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
    Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.
    Bakkalbasi N; Bauer K; Glover J; Wang L
    Biomed Digit Libr; 2006 Jun; 3():7. PubMed ID: 16805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W
    ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases.
    AlRyalat SAS; Malkawi LW; Momani SM
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Oct; (152):. PubMed ID: 31710021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
    Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles.
    Kokol P; Vošner HB
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Jan; 106(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 29339937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?
    Trapp J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 39(4):817-823. PubMed ID: 27578318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.
    Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 25554521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Citation Analysis of the Korean Journal of Urology From Web of Science, Scopus, Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar.
    Huh S
    Korean J Urol; 2013 Apr; 54(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 23614057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical literature search dot com.
    Jain V; Raut DK
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 21393941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Citation Analysis of Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences in ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Zarifmahmoudi L; Kianifar HR; Sadeghi R
    Iran J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Oct; 16(10):1027-30. PubMed ID: 24379959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.
    Martín-Martín A; Thelwall M; Orduna-Malea E; Delgado López-Cózar E
    Scientometrics; 2021; 126(1):871-906. PubMed ID: 32981987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
    Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Improved Forensic Science Information Search.
    Teitelbaum J
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2015 Jan; 27(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 26227137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses.
    Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research progress in muscle-derived stem cells: Literature retrieval results based on international database.
    Zhang L; Wang W
    Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(10):784-91. PubMed ID: 25737703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Citation Cloud of a biomedical article: a free, public, web-based tool enabling citation analysis.
    Smalheiser NR; Schneider J; Torvik VI; Fragnito DP; Tirk EE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jan; 110(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 35210969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.