296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17885187)
41. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: automated recognition of ileocecal valve to reduce number of false-positive detections.
Summers RM; Yao J; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):266-72. PubMed ID: 15454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy.
Vogt C; Cohnen M; Beck A; vom Dahl S; Aurich V; Mödder U; Häussinger D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Aug; 60(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 15278045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. CAD-associated reader error in CT colonography.
Koshkin VS; Hinshaw JL; Wroblewski K; Dachman AH
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 22537502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A CAD of fully automated colonic polyp detection for contrasted and non-contrasted CT scans.
Tulum G; Bolat B; Osman O
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Apr; 12(4):627-644. PubMed ID: 28101760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations.
Doshi T; Rusinak D; Halvorsen RA; Rockey DC; Suzuki K; Dachman AH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 17581901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Wavelet method for CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection.
Li J; Van Uitert R; Yao J; Petrick N; Franaszek M; Huang A; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3527-38. PubMed ID: 18777913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation.
Halligan S; Taylor SA; Dehmeshki J; Amin H; Ye X; Tsang J; Roddie ME
Clin Radiol; 2006 Sep; 61(9):758-63; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 16905382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of computer-assisted detection (CAD) programs for the identification of colorectal polyps: performance and sensitivity analysis, current limitations and practical tips for radiologists.
Bell LTO; Gandhi S
Clin Radiol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):593.e11-593.e18. PubMed ID: 29602538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography.
Helbren E; Fanshawe TR; Phillips P; Mallett S; Boone D; Gale A; Altman DG; Taylor SA; Manning D; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1570-8. PubMed ID: 25577518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system.
Graser A; Kolligs FT; Mang T; Schaefer C; Geisbüsch S; Reiser MF; Becker CR
Eur Radiol; 2007 Oct; 17(10):2608-15. PubMed ID: 17429646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers.
Dachman AH; Kelly KB; Zintsmaster MP; Rana R; Khankari S; Novak JD; Ali AN; Qalbani A; Fletcher JG
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18796675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Feature-guided analysis for reduction of false positives in CAD of polyps for computed tomographic colonography.
Näppi J; Yoshida H
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1592-601. PubMed ID: 12906177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.
Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 16498097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A straightforward approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric feature in CT colonography.
Lee JG; Hyo Kim J; Hyung Kim S; Sun Park H; Ihn Choi B
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):790-801. PubMed ID: 21762887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height.
Summers RM; Frentz SM; Liu J; Yao J; Brown L; Louie A; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Dwyer AJ; Pickhardt PJ; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 19064206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
