These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17885254)

  • 1. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale.
    Quinn TJ; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR
    Stroke; 2007 Nov; 38(11):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17885254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review.
    Quinn TJ; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR
    Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3393-5. PubMed ID: 19679846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale.
    Newcommon NJ; Green TL; Haley E; Cooke T; Hill MD
    Stroke; 2003 Feb; 34(2):377-8; author reply 377-8. PubMed ID: 12574545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictions models in acute stroke: potential uses and limitations.
    Dennis M
    Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1665-6. PubMed ID: 18403744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of structured modified rankin scale assessment.
    Quinn TJ; McArthur K; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR
    Stroke; 2010 Dec; 41(12):e602; author reply e603. PubMed ID: 21030706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telephone assessment of stroke outcome is reliable.
    Merino JG; Lattimore SU; Warach S
    Stroke; 2005 Feb; 36(2):232-3. PubMed ID: 15637321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial experience of a digital training resource for modified Rankin scale assessment in clinical trials.
    Quinn TJ; Lees KR; Hardemark HG; Dawson J; Walters MR
    Stroke; 2007 Aug; 38(8):2257-61. PubMed ID: 17600236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
    Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving modified Rankin Scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire.
    Bruno A; Shah N; Lin C; Close B; Hess DC; Davis K; Baute V; Switzer JA; Waller JL; Nichols FT
    Stroke; 2010 May; 41(5):1048-50. PubMed ID: 20224060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues pertaining to the critiques of the SAINT-I Trial.
    Fisher M; Hess DC; Lees K
    Stroke; 2007 Nov; 38(11):e126-7; author reply e128. PubMed ID: 17968005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales.
    Kasner SE
    Lancet Neurol; 2006 Jul; 5(7):603-12. PubMed ID: 16781990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The seven wonders of China in stroke therapy: fact or illusion?
    Bereczki D
    Stroke; 2007 Nov; 38(11):e142; author reply e143. PubMed ID: 17872478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment.
    Shinohara Y; Minematsu K; Amano T; Ohashi Y
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 21(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 16446542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive.
    Kerr DM; Fulton RL; Lees KR;
    Stroke; 2012 May; 43(5):1401-3. PubMed ID: 22308254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and interpreting results of systematic reviews.
    Harvey L; Wyndaele JJ
    Spinal Cord; 2009 Nov; 47(11):777. PubMed ID: 19890366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misclassification and treatment effect on primary outcome measures in clinical trials of severe neurotrauma.
    Choi SC; Clifton GL; Marmarou A; Miller ER
    J Neurotrauma; 2002 Jan; 19(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11852975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimising outcome assessment to improve quality and efficiency of stroke trials.
    McArthur K; Fan Y; Pei Z; Quinn T
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Feb; 14(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 24350886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical appraisal and review of the Rankin scale and its derivatives.
    New PW; Buchbinder R
    Neuroepidemiology; 2006; 26(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 16272826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the analysis and interpretation of outcome measures in stroke clinical trials: lessons from the SAINT I study of NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke.
    Koziol JA; Feng AC
    Stroke; 2006 Oct; 37(10):2644-7. PubMed ID: 16946150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial: Assessing and enhancing clinical significance/social validity of intervention research in pediatric psychology.
    Rapoff MA
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2010 Mar; 35(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 19914955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.