These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17885869)

  • 1. Sample size calculation for weighted rank tests comparing survival distributions under cluster randomization: a simulation method.
    Jung SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(5):839-49. PubMed ID: 17885869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculation for the weighted rank statistics with paired survival data.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3350-65. PubMed ID: 18205148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculation for cluster randomization trials with a time-to-event endpoint.
    Li J; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(25):3608-3623. PubMed ID: 33463748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculation for clustered survival data under subunit randomization.
    Li J; Jung SH
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jan; 28(1):40-67. PubMed ID: 34716530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
    Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and sample size estimation in clinical trials with clustered survival times as the primary endpoint.
    Xie T; Waksman J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2835-46. PubMed ID: 12953283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
    Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cluster-adjusted sample size algorithm for proportions was developed using a beta-binomial model.
    Fosgate GT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17292018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size calculations for clustered binary data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1971-82. PubMed ID: 11427953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MSurvPow: a FORTRAN program to calculate the sample size and power for cluster-randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes.
    Gao F; Manatunga AK; Chen S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Apr; 78(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15780890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A signed-rank test for clustered data.
    Datta S; Satten GA
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 17970820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rank tests for clustered survival data when dependent subunits are randomized.
    Jeong JH; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):361-73. PubMed ID: 16158408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal analysis of correlated failure time data with informative cluster sizes.
    Cong XJ; Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 17825000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.