These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17885947)
1. Current status of antifungal susceptibility testing methods. Arikan S Med Mycol; 2007 Nov; 45(7):569-87. PubMed ID: 17885947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream yeasts isolated at a public children's hospital in Brazil: comparison of the Etest and the AFST-EUCAST microdilution method. Matsumoto FE; Dias AL; Melhem MS; Szeszs MW; Auler ME; Ruiz LS; Gonçalves da Silva E; Gandra RF; Paula CR Can J Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 53(12):1300-6. PubMed ID: 18059562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between CLSI, EUCAST and Etest methodologies for amphotericin B and fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. clinical isolates. Claudino AL; Peixoto RF; Melhem MS; Szeszs MW; Lyon JP; Chavasco JK; Franco MC Pharmazie; 2008 Apr; 63(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 18468388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicentre determination of quality control strains and quality control ranges for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts and filamentous fungi using the methods of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST). Cuenca-Estrella M; Arendrup MC; Chryssanthou E; Dannaoui E; Lass-Florl C; Sandven P; Velegraki A; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 Oct; 13(10):1018-22. PubMed ID: 17697001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of the WIDERYST susceptibility testing system for detection of in vitro antifungal resistance in yeasts. Cuenca-Estrella M; Gomez-Lopez A; Gutierrez MO; Buitrago MJ; Rodriguez-Tudela JL Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2008 Mar; 52(3):1062-5. PubMed ID: 18195057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. International and multicenter comparison of EUCAST and CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution methods for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. to fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. Espinel-Ingroff A; Barchiesi F; Cuenca-Estrella M; Pfaller MA; Rinaldi M; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Verweij PE J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 43(8):3884-9. PubMed ID: 16081926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the reference broth microdilution method and Etest. Fleck R; Dietz A; Hof H J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Apr; 59(4):767-71. PubMed ID: 17293369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test methods for the antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. strains isolated from blood cultures]. Ozcan SK; Mutlu B; Dündar D; Willke A Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Apr; 44(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 20549961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antifungal susceptibility testing by flow cytometry: is it the future? Vale-Silva LA; Buchta V Mycoses; 2006 Jul; 49(4):261-73. PubMed ID: 16784439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disk diffusion test and E-test with enriched Mueller-Hinton agar for determining susceptibility of Candida species to voriconazole and fluconazole. Lee SC; Lo HJ; Fung CP; Lee N; See LC J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2009 Apr; 42(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 19597647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to voriconazole among 13,338 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Tested by clinical and laboratory standards institute-recommended broth microdilution methods. Pfaller MA; Messer SA; Boyken L; Rice C; Tendolkar S; Hollis RJ; Diekema DJ J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 45(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 17079501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole. Diekema DJ; Messer SA; Hollis RJ; Boyken LB; Tendolkar S; Kroeger J; Pfaller MA J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1974-7. PubMed ID: 17301284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of two different methods for the investigation of in vitro susceptibilities of planktonic and biofilm forming Candida species to antifungal agents]. Kaynak Onurdağ F; Ozgen S; Abbasoğlu U; Gürcan IS Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Oct; 44(4):619-31. PubMed ID: 21063974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in antifungal susceptibility testing using CLSI reference and commercial methods. Cantón E; Espinel-Ingroff A; Pemán J Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2009 Feb; 7(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 19622060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida species by flow cytometry. Joung YH; Kim HR; Lee MK; Park AJ J Infect; 2007 May; 54(5):504-8. PubMed ID: 17084902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel with CLSI microdilution for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins against Candida spp., using new clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values. Pfaller MA; Chaturvedi V; Diekema DJ; Ghannoum MA; Holliday NM; Killian SB; Knapp CC; Messer SA; Miskou A; Ramani R Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Aug; 73(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 22726528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi. Vanden Bossche H; Dromer F; Improvisi I; Lozano-Chiu M; Rex JH; Sanglard D Med Mycol; 1998; 36 Suppl 1():119-28. PubMed ID: 9988500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]