These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17886161)

  • 21. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of blinks and saccadic eye movements on visual reaction times.
    Johns M; Crowley K; Chapman R; Tucker A; Hocking C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):783-8. PubMed ID: 19429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of response--effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task.
    Stöcker C; Sebald A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):685-703. PubMed ID: 12745836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flexible serial response learning by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Herbranson WT; Stanton GL
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 Aug; 125(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 21574691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task.
    Marcus DJ; Karatekin C; Markiewicz S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):420-32. PubMed ID: 16752605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning.
    Howard JH; Howard DV; Japikse KC; Eden GF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1131-44. PubMed ID: 16313930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting.
    Watson DG; Maylor EA; Bruce LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 18085951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implicit motor sequence learning is not represented purely in response locations.
    Richard MV; Clegg BA; Seger CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1516-22. PubMed ID: 19283555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incidental learning of a visuo-motor sequence modulates saccadic amplitude: Evidence from the serial reaction time task.
    Lum JAG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32584081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of response selection in sequence learning.
    Deroost N; Soetens E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 16627348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can different levels of S-R practice influence sequence learning? An investigation into the context of a perceptual-motor sequence learning task.
    Fezzani K; Thon B; Lagarde J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):463-75. PubMed ID: 11065306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.