These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17886193)
1. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart. Vadillo MA; Castro L; Matute H; Wasserman EA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17886193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship. Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory. Booth SL; Buehner MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory. Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning. Amundson JC; Escobar M; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 14570518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design. Vandorpe S; De Houwer J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory. Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Grange JA; Houghton G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning. Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning. Beesley T; Le Pelley ME J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations. Wasserman EA; Berglan LR Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 May; 51(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 9621838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery from blocking between outcomes. Wheeler DS; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both? Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Houghton G; Pritchard R; Grange JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):466-76. PubMed ID: 19271859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events. Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue-selection effects. Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17176664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound. Urushihara K; Stout SC; Miller RR Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 15043646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control. Nelson JB; Callejas-Aguilera JE J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):314-26. PubMed ID: 17620029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]