BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17887906)

  • 1. A finite element model for investigating the influence of keel design and position on unicompartmental knee replacement cementless tibial component fixation.
    MacAulay A; Rahman A; Marks L; Murray DW; Mellon SJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2024 Mar; 125():104119. PubMed ID: 38508799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A numerical investigation for the development of functionally graded Ti/HA tibial implant for total ankle replacement: Influence of material gradation law and volume fraction index.
    Jyoti ; Ghosh R
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2024 May; 112(5):e35417. PubMed ID: 38742468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical simulation of strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the ankle joint.
    Bouguecha A; Weigel N; Behrens BA; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Waizy H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Jul; 10():58. PubMed ID: 21729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Tibia-Fibula Geometry and Density From Anatomical Landmarks Via Statistical Appearance Model: Influence of Errors on Finite Element-Calculated Bone Strain.
    Bruce OL; Tu J; Edwards WB
    J Biomech Eng; 2024 Sep; 146(9):. PubMed ID: 38558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Warped finite element models predict whole shell failure in turtle shells.
    Stayton CT
    J Anat; 2018 Nov; 233(5):666-678. PubMed ID: 30058131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical effects of different loads and constraints on finite element modeling of the humerus.
    Islam S; Gide K; Schemitsch EH; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Bagheri ZS
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Dec; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38151986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full and surface tibial cementation in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical investigation of stress distribution and remodeling in the tibia.
    Cawley DT; Kelly N; Simpkin A; Shannon FJ; McGarry JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 22079691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study.
    Wang X; Li X; Wang C; Geng X; Chen B; Dong Z; Li Y; Zhao M; Li Z; Li F; Wang C; Tian H
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2937-2946. PubMed ID: 37712186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite Element Assessment of the Screw and Cement Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Zheng C; Ma HY; Du YQ; Sun JY; Luo JW; Qu DB; Zhou YG
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3718705. PubMed ID: 33123571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: The role of stems.
    Xie S; Conlisk N; Hamilton D; Scott C; Burnett R; Pankaj P
    Bone Joint Res; 2020 Apr; 9(4):162-172. PubMed ID: 32431807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.
    Peersman G; Taylan O; Slane J; Vanthienen B; Verhaegen J; Anthonissen L; van Lenthe GH; Heyse T; Scheys L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 32168072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element assessment of metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty.
    Frehill B; Crocombe AD
    J Orthop; 2020; 19():1-8. PubMed ID: 32021026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suitability of Metal Block Augmentation for Large Uncontained Bone Defect in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
    Kang KS; Tien TN; Lee MC; Lee KY; Kim B; Lim D
    J Clin Med; 2019 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30893934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduced tibial strain-shielding with extraosseous total knee arthroplasty revision system.
    Correa TA; Pal B; van Arkel RJ; Vanacore F; Amis AA
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Dec; 62():22-28. PubMed ID: 30314902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems.
    Quilez MP; Seral B; Pérez MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184361. PubMed ID: 28886100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of Bone: Diagnosis of SCI-Induced Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Prediction.
    Troy KL; Morse LR
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2015; 21(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 26689691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of the tibial tray design in TKA: comparison between modular and offset tibial trays.
    Chan Â; Gamelas J; Folgado J; Fernandes PR
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):590-8. PubMed ID: 23982758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 17887906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.