These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17888169)
1. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry. Eriksson E; Aspan A BMC Vet Res; 2007 Sep; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17888169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of invA-PCR and culture detection methods on occurrence and survival of salmonella in the flesh, internal organs and lymphoid tissues of experimentally infected pigs. Arnold T; Scholz HC; Marg H; Rösler U; Hensel A J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2004 Dec; 51(10):459-63. PubMed ID: 15606871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of Salmonella in faecal, tissue, and feed samples by conventional culture methods and VIDAS Salmonella Test]. Sommerhäuser J; Failing K Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):22-7. PubMed ID: 16450704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach. Wilkins W; Waldner C; Rajić A; McFall M; Muckle A; Mainar-Jaime RC Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():115-20. PubMed ID: 21083825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a 20-h real-time PCR method for screening of Salmonella in poultry faecal samples. Löfström C; Hansen F; Hoorfar J Vet Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 144(3-4):511-4. PubMed ID: 20207510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth inhibitory factors in bovine faeces impairs detection of Salmonella Dublin by conventional culture procedure. Baggesen DL; Nielsen LR; Sørensen G; Bødker R; Ersbøll AK J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 103(3):650-6. PubMed ID: 17714398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis. Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis. Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of DNA isolation methods and detection of Salmonella spp. from animal faeces and dust using invA real-time PCR. Braun SD; Methner U Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2011; 124(5-6):177-85. PubMed ID: 22059286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PCR-ELISA and LightCycler real-time PCR assays for detecting Salmonella spp. in milk and meat samples. Perelle S; Dilasser F; Malorny B; Grout J; Hoorfar J; Fach P Mol Cell Probes; 2004 Dec; 18(6):409-20. PubMed ID: 15488381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ring-trial results for the cultural detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces]. Malorny B; Dorn C; Schroeter A; Käsbohrer A; Helmuth R Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007; 120(7-8):334-9. PubMed ID: 17715826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine. Sibley J; Yue B; Huang F; Harding J; Kingdon J; Chirino-Trejo M; Appleyard GD Can J Vet Res; 2003 Jul; 67(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 12889729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combination of direct-ELISA and PCR for the rapid detection and identification of Salmonella spp]. Huang JL; Jiao XA; Pan ZM; Wen QY; Sun L; Liu XF Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 38(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 15498250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salmonella contamination in pigs at slaughter and on the farm: a field study using an antibody ELISA test and a PCR technique. Nowak B; von Müffling T; Chaunchom S; Hartung J Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 115(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17292500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of culture, ELISA and PCR assays for the detection of Salmonella in seafood. Kumar R; Surendran PK; Thampuran N Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 46(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 18028326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and microbiological culture for detection of salmonellae in equine feces and environmental samples. Cohen ND; Martin LJ; Simpson RB; Wallis DE; Neibergs HL Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 8725799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Salmonella detection in poultry samples. Comparison of two commercial real-time PCR systems with culture methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. in environmental and fecal samples of poultry. Sommer D; Enderlein D; Antakli A; Schönenbrücher H; Slaghuis J; Redmann T; Lierz M Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2012; 40(6):383-9. PubMed ID: 23242148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved diagnostic and real-time pcr in rapid screening for Salmonella in the poultry food chain. Szmolka A; Kaszanyitzky E; Nagy B Acta Vet Hung; 2006 Sep; 54(3):297-312. PubMed ID: 17020134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The estimation of pooled-sample sensitivity for detection of Salmonella in turkey flocks. Arnold ME; Mueller-Doblies D; Carrique-Mas JJ; Davies RH J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 107(3):936-43. PubMed ID: 19320955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]