313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17888169)
1. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry.
Eriksson E; Aspan A
BMC Vet Res; 2007 Sep; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17888169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of invA-PCR and culture detection methods on occurrence and survival of salmonella in the flesh, internal organs and lymphoid tissues of experimentally infected pigs.
Arnold T; Scholz HC; Marg H; Rösler U; Hensel A
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2004 Dec; 51(10):459-63. PubMed ID: 15606871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of Salmonella in faecal, tissue, and feed samples by conventional culture methods and VIDAS Salmonella Test].
Sommerhäuser J; Failing K
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):22-7. PubMed ID: 16450704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach.
Wilkins W; Waldner C; Rajić A; McFall M; Muckle A; Mainar-Jaime RC
Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():115-20. PubMed ID: 21083825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a 20-h real-time PCR method for screening of Salmonella in poultry faecal samples.
Löfström C; Hansen F; Hoorfar J
Vet Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 144(3-4):511-4. PubMed ID: 20207510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth inhibitory factors in bovine faeces impairs detection of Salmonella Dublin by conventional culture procedure.
Baggesen DL; Nielsen LR; Sørensen G; Bødker R; Ersbøll AK
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 103(3):650-6. PubMed ID: 17714398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis.
Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis.
Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M
Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of DNA isolation methods and detection of Salmonella spp. from animal faeces and dust using invA real-time PCR.
Braun SD; Methner U
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2011; 124(5-6):177-85. PubMed ID: 22059286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PCR-ELISA and LightCycler real-time PCR assays for detecting Salmonella spp. in milk and meat samples.
Perelle S; Dilasser F; Malorny B; Grout J; Hoorfar J; Fach P
Mol Cell Probes; 2004 Dec; 18(6):409-20. PubMed ID: 15488381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ring-trial results for the cultural detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces].
Malorny B; Dorn C; Schroeter A; Käsbohrer A; Helmuth R
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007; 120(7-8):334-9. PubMed ID: 17715826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine.
Sibley J; Yue B; Huang F; Harding J; Kingdon J; Chirino-Trejo M; Appleyard GD
Can J Vet Res; 2003 Jul; 67(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 12889729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combination of direct-ELISA and PCR for the rapid detection and identification of Salmonella spp].
Huang JL; Jiao XA; Pan ZM; Wen QY; Sun L; Liu XF
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 38(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 15498250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salmonella contamination in pigs at slaughter and on the farm: a field study using an antibody ELISA test and a PCR technique.
Nowak B; von Müffling T; Chaunchom S; Hartung J
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 115(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17292500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of culture, ELISA and PCR assays for the detection of Salmonella in seafood.
Kumar R; Surendran PK; Thampuran N
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 46(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 18028326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and microbiological culture for detection of salmonellae in equine feces and environmental samples.
Cohen ND; Martin LJ; Simpson RB; Wallis DE; Neibergs HL
Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 8725799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Salmonella detection in poultry samples. Comparison of two commercial real-time PCR systems with culture methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. in environmental and fecal samples of poultry.
Sommer D; Enderlein D; Antakli A; Schönenbrücher H; Slaghuis J; Redmann T; Lierz M
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2012; 40(6):383-9. PubMed ID: 23242148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved diagnostic and real-time pcr in rapid screening for Salmonella in the poultry food chain.
Szmolka A; Kaszanyitzky E; Nagy B
Acta Vet Hung; 2006 Sep; 54(3):297-312. PubMed ID: 17020134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The estimation of pooled-sample sensitivity for detection of Salmonella in turkey flocks.
Arnold ME; Mueller-Doblies D; Carrique-Mas JJ; Davies RH
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 107(3):936-43. PubMed ID: 19320955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
