These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17888250)

  • 1. [A three-dimensional finite element analysis of 0.02 taper 20# stainless steel K files during root canal instrumentation].
    Yuan L; Yue L; Wang JD
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):346-8. PubMed ID: 17888250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of effect of root canal taper and post on tooth stress distribution].
    Zhang N; Feng CZ; Zhao SL; Fa YH; Cai XW
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 21575436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
    Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis.
    Kim TO; Cheung GS; Lee JM; Kim BM; Hur B; Kim HC
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19125976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of crack development in stainless-steel hedstrom files used with step-back or crown-down techniques.
    Kosti E; Zinelis S; Lambrianidis T; Margelos J
    J Endod; 2004 Jan; 30(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 14760906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of the effects of three preparation techniques on stresses within roots having curved canals.
    Cheng R; Zhou XD; Liu Z; Yang H; Gao QH; Hu T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 19228212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Kim HC; Cheung GS; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Kang SI
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 18498904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best of both worlds: stainless steel and nickel titanium.
    Klein P
    Dent Today; 1999 Jul; 18(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding and evaluating the endodontic file.
    Bahcall JK; Barss JT
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):690-2. PubMed ID: 12004664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
    Schäfer E; Lau R
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Torsional properties of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files after multiple autoclave sterilizations.
    Hilt BR; Cunningham CJ; Shen C; Richards N
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 11194376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files.
    Wolcott J; Himel VT
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 9594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
    Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design improvement and failure reduction of endodontic files through finite element analysis: application to V-Taper file designs.
    He R; Ni J
    J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1552-7. PubMed ID: 20728726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
    Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.