These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17888767)

  • 1. The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):765-71, v. PubMed ID: 17888767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
    Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mammary lesions with special regard to the BI-RADS((R)) classification system in mammography].
    Boehm T; Garzoli E; Marincek B
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2002; 42(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 12373023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The probably benign assessment.
    Leung JW; Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):773-89, vi. PubMed ID: 17888768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 2005 May; 15(5):1027-36. PubMed ID: 15856253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
    Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
    Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing Asymmetries at Mammography: A Multimodality Approach to Assessment and Management.
    Chesebro AL; Winkler NS; Birdwell RL; Giess CS
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 26963449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic screening and reporting: a need for standardisation. A review.
    Akhigbe AO; Igbinedion BO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2013 Dec; 20(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 24633281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
    Kettritz U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.