535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17888772)
21. Generalized subtraction methods in digital mammography.
Taibi A
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 18799280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection.
Kao TJ; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4142-5. PubMed ID: 18002914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.
Pisano ED; Zuley M; Baum JK; Marques HS
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):813-30, vi. PubMed ID: 17888771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.
Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 24450669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
Smith A
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Initial Clinical Experience with Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Lee YZ; Puett C; Inscoe CR; Jia B; Kim C; Walsh R; Yoon S; Kim SJ; Kuzmiak CM; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1363-1372. PubMed ID: 30660473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.
Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Gluskin J; Click M; Fleischman R; Dromain C; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():147-154. PubMed ID: 28987661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Johnson MM
Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations.
Friedewald SM
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Advances in mammographic imaging.
Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):273-5. PubMed ID: 20223907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.
Svahn T; Andersson I; Chakraborty D; Svensson S; Ikeda D; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 20228048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection: preliminary patient study.
Kao TJ; Boverman G; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Choi MH; Moore RH; Kopans DB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1762-8. PubMed ID: 19033092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast CT.
Glick SJ
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
