31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17889983)
1. Clinical parameters for prediction of successful labor induction after application of intravaginal dinoprostone in nulliparous Chinese women.
Hou L; Zhu Y; Ma X; Li J; Zhang W
Med Sci Monit; 2012 Aug; 18(8):CR518-522. PubMed ID: 22847202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical ripening balloon compared with vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term: A prospective cohort study.
Ducarme G; Gilman S; Sauvee M; Planche L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38520064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour.
Liu W; Guo L; Feng L; Wang J; Zhang M; Fan X
Int J Womens Health; 2024; 16():1093-1101. PubMed ID: 38887592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
Grobman WA; Rice MM; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Perez-Delboy A; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Boggess KA; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 30089070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Coste Mazeau P; Hessas M; Martin R; Eyraud JL; Margueritte F; Aubard Y; Sallee C; Sire F; Gauthier T
Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 31915047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent advances in the induction of labor.
Marconi AM
F1000Res; 2019; 8():. PubMed ID: 31723412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Labor Induction: A Cost-Consequences Model for 5 European Countries-An Economic Evaluation Supported with Literature Review and Retrospective Data Collection.
Bierut A; Dowgiałło-Smolarczyk J; Pieniążek I; Stelmachowski J; Pacocha K; Sobkowski M; Baev OR; Walczak J
Adv Ther; 2016 Oct; 33(10):1755-1770. PubMed ID: 27549327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
Rath W
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Tenore JL
Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial.
Marconi AM; Bozzetti P; Morabito A; Pardi G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jun; 138(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17889983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
