248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17891618)
1. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
Lembcke A; Kivelitz DE; Borges AC; Lachnitt A; Hein PA; Dohmen PM; Thiele H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging.
Puymirat E; Chassaing S; Trinquart L; Barbey C; Chaudeurge A; Bar O; Blanchard D
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 106(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 20599011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
Debl K; Djavidani B; Seitz J; Nitz W; Schmid FX; Muders F; Buchner S; Feuerbach S; Riegger G; Luchner A
Invest Radiol; 2005 Oct; 40(10):631-6. PubMed ID: 16189431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Yap SC; van Geuns RJ; Meijboom FJ; Kirschbaum SW; McGhie JS; Simoons ML; Kilner PJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 18066750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
Speiser U; Quick S; Haas D; Youssef A; Waessnig NK; Ibrahim K; Strasser RH; Schoen S
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography].
Saam T; Oberhoffer M; Rist C; Minaifar N; Vogt F; Reichart B; Becker C; Reiser M; Nikolaou K
Rofo; 2008 Jun; 180(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 18504666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The complementary role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis.
Thomas B; Freitas A; Ferreira R; Tavares NJ
Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1117-21. PubMed ID: 16335285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
