BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17891664)

  • 1. Performance of cocaine dependent individuals and controls on a response inhibition task with varying levels of difficulty.
    Lane SD; Moeller FG; Steinberg JL; Buzby M; Kosten TR
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2007; 33(5):717-26. PubMed ID: 17891664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive impulsivity in cocaine and heroin polysubstance abusers.
    Verdejo-García AJ; Perales JC; Pérez-García M
    Addict Behav; 2007 May; 32(5):950-66. PubMed ID: 16876962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Morimoto H; Hirose S; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 18445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural mechanisms underlying drug-related cue distraction in active cocaine users.
    Hester R; Garavan H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Sep; 93(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 19135471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional bias towards cocaine-related stimuli: relationship to treatment-seeking for cocaine dependence.
    Vadhan NP; Carpenter KM; Copersino ML; Hart CL; Foltin RW; Nunes EV
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2007; 33(5):727-36. PubMed ID: 17891665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
    Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity.
    Correa A; Triviño M; Pérez-Dueñas C; Acosta A; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 20566235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error-processing deficits in patients with cocaine dependence.
    Franken IH; van Strien JW; Franzek EJ; van de Wetering BJ
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17196732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dissociation in attentional control: evidence from methamphetamine dependence.
    Salo R; Nordahl TE; Moore C; Waters C; Natsuaki Y; Galloway GP; Kile S; Sullivan EV
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 57(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 15691533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers.
    Kertzman S; Lowengrub K; Aizer A; Vainder M; Kotler M; Dannon PN
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Oct; 161(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18789539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuropsychological mechanisms of Digit Symbol Substitution Test impairment in Asperger Disorder.
    Yoran-Hegesh R; Kertzman S; Vishne T; Weizman A; Kotler M
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Mar; 166(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19215988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive inhibition and working memory in unipolar depression.
    Gohier B; Ferracci L; Surguladze SA; Lawrence E; El Hage W; Kefi MZ; Allain P; Garre JB; Le Gall D
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Jul; 116(1-2):100-5. PubMed ID: 19042027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral decrease in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation during motor response inhibition in mania.
    Mazzola-Pomietto P; Kaladjian A; Azorin JM; Anton JL; Jeanningros R
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 18586275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute effects of cocaine in two models of inhibitory control: implications of non-linear dose effects.
    Fillmore MT; Rush CR; Hays L
    Addiction; 2006 Sep; 101(9):1323-32. PubMed ID: 16911732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.
    O'Connell RG; Dockree PM; Bellgrove MA; Turin A; Ward S; Foxe JJ; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18476764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.