BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17892187)

  • 1. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inadequacies of hospital medical records.
    Patel AG; Mould T; Webb PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jan; 75(1 Suppl):7-9. PubMed ID: 8422161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.
    Grewal P
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 23618448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer generated operation notes.
    Currall VA; Chesser TJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():51-5. PubMed ID: 18560067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of medical record-keeping in maxillofacial surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan using the CRABEL Scoring system.
    Arotiba JT; Akinmoladun VI; Okoje VN
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2006 Mar; 35(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 17209334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve.
    Lefter LP; Walker SR; Dewhurst F; Turner RW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):800-2. PubMed ID: 18844913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma--completion of the audit cycle.
    Nicopoullos JD; Karrar S; Gour A; Panter K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12881077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?
    O'Bichere A; Sellu D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Sep; 79(5 Suppl):204-8; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 9496162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals. Are we following Royal College guidelines?
    Baigrie RJ; Dowling BL; Birch D; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1 Suppl):8-10. PubMed ID: 8017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk management: role of the medical record department.
    Feather H; Morgan N
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):40-8. PubMed ID: 10114765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit.
    Rogers A; Bunting M; Atherstone A
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Sep; 98(9):726-8. PubMed ID: 19113057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit.
    Din R; Jena D; Muddu BN
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Sep; 83(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 11806555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.
    Dhariwal DK; Gibbons AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 15121263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standards in Operation Notes--Is It Time to Re-Emphasise Their Importance?
    Cahill KC; Burchette D; Kerin MJ; Kelly JL
    Ir Med J; 2016 Jan; 109(1):332-4. PubMed ID: 26904788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.
    Bateman ND; Carney AS; Gibbin KP
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):94-5. PubMed ID: 10230203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of handwritten surgical operative notes from surgical trainees: a noteworthy issue.
    Nzenza TC; Manning T; Ngweso S; Perera M; Sengupta S; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 29148172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pathological form in breast cancer: setting and evaluation of a professional pratice].
    Barré M; Classe JM; Dravet F; Dupré PF; Loussouarn D; Toquet C; Sagan C
    Ann Pathol; 2009 Jun; 29(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 19619820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.