286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17892327)
1. PCA-correlated SNPs for structure identification in worldwide human populations.
Paschou P; Ziv E; Burchard EG; Choudhry S; Rodriguez-Cintron W; Mahoney MW; Drineas P
PLoS Genet; 2007 Sep; 3(9):1672-86. PubMed ID: 17892327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ancestral informative marker selection and population structure visualization using sparse Laplacian eigenfunctions.
Zhang J
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13734. PubMed ID: 21079796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FastPop: a rapid principal component derived method to infer intercontinental ancestry using genetic data.
Li Y; Byun J; Cai G; Xiao X; Han Y; Cornelis O; Dinulos JE; Dennis J; Easton D; Gorlov I; Seldin MF; Amos CI
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():122. PubMed ID: 26961892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracing sub-structure in the European American population with PCA-informative markers.
Paschou P; Drineas P; Lewis J; Nievergelt CM; Nickerson DA; Smith JD; Ridker PM; Chasman DI; Krauss RM; Ziv E
PLoS Genet; 2008 Jul; 4(7):e1000114. PubMed ID: 18797516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient genomewide selection of PCA-correlated tSNPs for genotype imputation.
Javed A; Drineas P; Mahoney MW; Paschou P
Ann Hum Genet; 2011 Nov; 75(6):707-22. PubMed ID: 21902678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparse principal component analysis for identifying ancestry-informative markers in genome-wide association studies.
Lee S; Epstein MP; Duncan R; Lin X
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 May; 36(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 22508067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NetView: a high-definition network-visualization approach to detect fine-scale population structures from genome-wide patterns of variation.
Neuditschko M; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48375. PubMed ID: 23152744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating a subset of ancestry informative SNPs for discriminating among Southwest Asian and circum-Mediterranean populations.
Bulbul O; Cherni L; Khodjet-El-Khil H; Rajeevan H; Kidd KK
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():153-158. PubMed ID: 27160361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection of highly informative SNP markers for population affiliation of major US populations.
Zeng X; Chakraborty R; King JL; LaRue B; Moura-Neto RS; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 26645290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a novel panel of genome-wide ancestry informative markers for bio-geographical ancestry estimates.
Jia J; Wei YL; Qin CJ; Hu L; Wan LH; Li CX
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 24315607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inferring geographic coordinates of origin for Europeans using small panels of ancestry informative markers.
Drineas P; Lewis J; Paschou P
PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11892. PubMed ID: 20805874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel probabilistic models of spatial genetic ancestry with applications to stratification correction in genome-wide association studies.
Bhaskar A; Javanmard A; Courtade TA; Tse D
Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):879-885. PubMed ID: 28025204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ancestry prediction in Singapore population samples using the Illumina ForenSeq kit.
Ramani A; Wong Y; Tan SZ; Shue BH; Syn C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():171-179. PubMed ID: 29040920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A PCA-based method for ancestral informative markers selection in structured populations.
Zhang F; Zhang L; Deng HW
Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 52(10):972-6. PubMed ID: 19911134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined use of principal component analysis and random forests identify population-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms: application in cattle breeds.
Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Calò DG; Schiavo G; Matassino D; Fontanesi L
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):346-56. PubMed ID: 25781205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical testing of a 23-AIMs panel of SNPs for ancestry evaluations in four major US populations.
Zeng X; Warshauer DH; King JL; Churchill JD; Chakraborty R; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jul; 130(4):891-896. PubMed ID: 26914801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.
Conomos MP; Miller MB; Thornton TA
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):276-93. PubMed ID: 25810074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of population structure using correlated SNPs by shrinkage principal components.
Zou F; Lee S; Knowles MR; Wright FA
Hum Hered; 2010; 70(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 20413978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations.
Gärke C; Ytournel F; Bed'hom B; Gut I; Lathrop M; Weigend S; Simianer H
Anim Genet; 2012 Aug; 43(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 22497629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genotypes of informative loci from 1000 Genomes data allude evolution and mixing of human populations.
Padakanti S; Tiong KL; Chen YB; Yeang CH
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17741. PubMed ID: 34493766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
