These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17892406)
1. Reliability of a telephone-based Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment using a structured interview in a heterogenous population of patients and examiners. LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Moss LG; Todd MM J Neurotrauma; 2007 Sep; 24(9):1437-46. PubMed ID: 17892406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews. Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2003; 18(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 12802167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Janssen PM; Visser NA; Dorhout Mees SM; Klijn CJ; Algra A; Rinkel GJ Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010 Jan; 29(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 19955737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a structured interview for telephone assessment of the modified Rankin Scale in Brazilian stroke patients. Baggio JA; Santos-Pontelli TE; Cougo-Pinto PT; Camilo M; Silva NF; Antunes P; Machado L; Leite JP; Pontes-Neto OM Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 38(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 25412853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Wilson JT; Edwards P; Fiddes H; Stewart E; Teasdale GM J Neurotrauma; 2002 Sep; 19(9):999-1005. PubMed ID: 12482113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry. Ekegren CL; Hart MJ; Brown A; Gabbe BJ Injury; 2016 Jan; 47(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 26304002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [French version of structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines and first studies of validation]. Fayol P; Carrière H; Habonimana D; Preux PM; Dumond JJ Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2004 May; 47(4):142-56. PubMed ID: 15130712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM J Neurotrauma; 1998 Aug; 15(8):573-85. PubMed ID: 9726257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM J Neurosurg; 1998 Dec; 89(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 9833819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The physical performance test and the evaluation of functional status in patients with cerebral aneurysms. King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS J Neurosurg; 2006 Apr; 104(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 16619655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prediction of long-term outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage as measured by the Short Form-36 Health Survey. Scharbrodt W; Stein M; Schreiber V; Böker DK; Oertel MF J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1409-13. PubMed ID: 19581094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structured interview to improve the reliability and psychometric integrity of the Disability Rating Scale. Malec JF; Hammond FM; Giacino JT; Whyte J; Wright J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Sep; 93(9):1603-8. PubMed ID: 22510680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury. Bossers SM; van der Naalt J; Jacobs B; Schwarte LA; Verheul R; Schober P J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2021 May-Jun 01; 36(3):E134-E138. PubMed ID: 33201032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health-related information postdischarge: telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Korner-Bitensky N; Wood-Dauphinee S; Siemiatycki J; Shapiro S; Becker R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1287-96. PubMed ID: 7993166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. Levin HS; Boake C; Song J; Mccauley S; Contant C; Diaz-Marchan P; Brundage S; Goodman H; Kotrla KJ J Neurotrauma; 2001 Jun; 18(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11437080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Extended) and the Functional Status Examination. Hudak AM; Caesar RR; Frol AB; Krueger K; Harper CR; Temkin NR; Dikmen SS; Carlile M; Madden C; Diaz-Arrastia R J Neurotrauma; 2005 Nov; 22(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16305320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement. McMillan T; Wilson L; Ponsford J; Levin H; Teasdale G; Bond M Nat Rev Neurol; 2016 Aug; 12(8):477-85. PubMed ID: 27418377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale. Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Aug; 69(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10896694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Grant M; Baird T; Schulz UG; Muir KW; Bone I Stroke; 2002 Sep; 33(9):2243-6. PubMed ID: 12215594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simple and reliable determination of the modified rankin scale score in neurosurgical and neurological patients: the mRS-9Q. Patel N; Rao VA; Heilman-Espinoza ER; Lai R; Quesada RA; Flint AC Neurosurgery; 2012 Nov; 71(5):971-5; discussion 975. PubMed ID: 22843133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]