BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17892943)

  • 1. Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.
    Bengi O; Karaçay S; Akin E; Okçu KM; Olmez H; Mermut S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(6-7):302-10. PubMed ID: 17892943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Premaxillary distraction osteogenesis with an individual tooth-borne appliance.
    Bengi AO; Gürton AO; Okcu KM; Aydintug YS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 15264658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue profile changes of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate following maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study.
    Harada K; Baba Y; Ohyama K; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 12464889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with rigid external distraction.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11905329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of postoperative midfacial deformity of chilopalatognathus by distraction osteogenesis with a self-constructed tooth-borne distraction device.
    Zhao SF; Tang EY; Hu QG; Yang XD; Da SJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1028-32. PubMed ID: 24705241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advancement of maxillary anterior segment by distraction osteogenesis (DO): a case report.
    Gualini C
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 17364033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 2-stage procedure combining maxillary advancement by distraction technique with mandibular setback surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Mori Y; Eguchi T; Matsuzaki M; Ogihara Y; Susami T; Chikazu D; Saijo H; Yonehara Y; Takato T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 35(7):594-7. PubMed ID: 16697142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability, tipping and relapse of bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion; a prospective randomized patient trial.
    Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ; Hop WC; van der Wal KG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 19278832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
    Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary anterior segmental advancement by using distraction osteogenesis: a case report.
    Dolanmaz D; Karaman AI; Ozyesil AG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 12725378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.
    Rachmiel A; Aizenbud D; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 16053864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using Le Fort I osteotomy without intraoperative down-fracture.
    Yamauchi K; Mitsugi M; Takahashi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 16513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incomplete mobilization of the maxilla resulting in failed maxillary distraction: a case report.
    Alkan A; Inal S; Baş B; Ozer M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):e5-11. PubMed ID: 17942333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
    Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.
    Yu H; Wang X; Fang B; Shen SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2641-7. PubMed ID: 22520568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual segmental distraction osteogenesis of the midface in a patient with Apert syndrome.
    Takashima M; Kitai N; Murakami S; Takagi S; Hosokawa K; Kreiborg S; Takada K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Jul; 43(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 16854210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trans-sinusal maxillary distraction for correction of midfacial hypoplasia: long-term clinical results.
    Nadjmi N; Schutyser F; Van Erum R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(10):885-96. PubMed ID: 16965902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical and orthodontic considerations for distraction osteogenesis with ROD appliances.
    Dessner S; Razdolsky Y; el-Bialy T
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):111-39. PubMed ID: 11905335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vector control in lower jaw distraction osteogenesis using an extra-oral multidirectional device.
    Hurmerinta K; Hukki J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 29(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 11673920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of single- or double-jaw surgery on vertical dimension in skeletal Class III patients.
    Enacar A; Taner T; Manav O
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11563393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.