BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17893049)

  • 1. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T.
    Soher BJ; Dale BM; Merkle EM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):277-90, v. PubMed ID: 17893049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
    Merkle EM; Dale BM; Paulson EK
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR cholangiopancreatography: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Schindera ST; Merkle EM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):355-64, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 17893055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges.
    Tanenbaum LN
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16530631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Ramalho M; Altun E; Herédia V; Zapparoli M; Semelka R
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):321-47, vi. PubMed ID: 17893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kidneys and MR urography.
    Leyendecker JR; Childs DD
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):373-82, vii. PubMed ID: 17893057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives on body MR imaging at ultrahigh field.
    Hecht EM; Lee RF; Taouli B; Sodickson DK
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):449-65, viii. PubMed ID: 17893062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Edelman RR
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):349-53, vi. PubMed ID: 17893054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges.
    Ramnath RR
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 16530633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR colonography: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Lauenstein TC; Saar B; Martin DR
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):395-402, vii. PubMed ID: 17893059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging: a brief review of image contrast.
    Makow LS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 27(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 2919228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging of the prostate: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Cornfeld DM; Weinreb JC
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):433-48, viii. PubMed ID: 17893061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Patak MA; von Weymarn C; Froehlich JM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):383-93, vii. PubMed ID: 17893058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Susceptibility effects in hyperpolarized (3)He lung MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
    Deppe MH; Parra-Robles J; Ajraoui S; Parnell SR; Clemence M; Schulte RF; Wild JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 19629971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR imaging of the spine at 3T.
    Shapiro MD
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 16530638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple solution for reducing artefacts due to conductive and dielectric effects in clinical magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
    Sreenivas M; Lowry M; Gibbs P; Pickles M; Turnbull LW
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 62(1):143-6. PubMed ID: 17169519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical applications of 3.0 T magnetic resonance system in the neuroradiological field].
    Matsusue E; Ogawa T
    Brain Nerve; 2007 May; 59(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 17533973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: imaging of the spine.
    Phalke VV; Gujar S; Quint DJ
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2006 May; 16(2):241-8, ix. PubMed ID: 16731363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla.
    Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Watkins DM; Buecker A; Schneider G
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):238-52. PubMed ID: 18850504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa: a comparative study of t2-weighted spin-echo sequences at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla.
    Fischbach F; Müller M; Bruhn H
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Apr; 49(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 18365827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.