These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17894294)

  • 1. Update in tonometry. Phosphene and rebound tonometries, self-tonometry and technologies for the future.
    Detry-Morel M
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2007; (303):87-95. PubMed ID: 17894294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
    ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice.
    Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
    Rehnman JB; Martin L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The pressure phosphene tonometer--a clinical evaluation.
    Chew GS; Sanderson GF; Molteno AC
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Jun; 19(6):683-5. PubMed ID: 15192693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies.
    Herndon LW
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Proview Eye Pressure Monitor: influence of clinical factors on accuracy and agreement with the Goldmann tonometer.
    Herse P; Hans A; Hall J; Langejans J; Markoulli M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 16101947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists.
    Abraham LM; Epasinghe NC; Selva D; Casson R
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Apr; 22(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 17159973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goldmann applanation tonometry over daily disposable contact lens: accuracy and safety of procedure.
    Zeri F; Lupelli L; Formichella P; Masci C; Fletcher R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):233-8; quiz, 260-1. PubMed ID: 17693127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advances in telemetric continuous intraocular pressure assessment.
    Kakaday T; Hewitt AW; Voelcker NH; Li JS; Craig JE
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 93(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 19244268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
    Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.