These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17894343)

  • 1. Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines.
    Martin O; Schomburg D
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1367-78. PubMed ID: 17894343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein docking using surface matching and supervised machine learning.
    Bordner AJ; Gorin AA
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):488-502. PubMed ID: 17444516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions.
    Duan Y; Reddy BV; Kaznessis YN
    Protein Sci; 2005 Feb; 14(2):316-28. PubMed ID: 15659366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites.
    Gottschalk KE; Neuvirth H; Schreiber G
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Feb; 17(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 15007163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions.
    Camacho CJ; Ma H; Champ PC
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):868-77. PubMed ID: 16506242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.
    Halperin I; Ma B; Wolfson H; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):409-43. PubMed ID: 12001221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal design of protein docking potentials: efficiency and limitations.
    Tobi D; Bahar I
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):970-81. PubMed ID: 16385562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of scoring schemes for protein docking.
    Heuser P; Schomburg D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():279. PubMed ID: 17678526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
    Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Lorenzen S; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19938153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
    J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using correlated parameters for improved ranking of protein-protein docking decoys.
    Mitra P; Pal D
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):787-96. PubMed ID: 20941737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations.
    Lorenzen S; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 17397057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions.
    Palma PN; Krippahl L; Wampler JE; Moura JJ
    Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):372-84. PubMed ID: 10813819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based classification of native and non-native protein-protein interactions: Comparing supervised and semi-supervised learning approaches.
    Zhao N; Pang B; Shyu CR; Korkin D
    Proteomics; 2011 Nov; 11(22):4321-30. PubMed ID: 22002942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.