These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17895791)

  • 1. Transparent rendering of intraluminal contrast for 3D polyp visualization at CT colonography.
    Shi R; Napel S; Rosenberg JK; Shin LK; Walsh CF; Mogensen MA; Joshi AJ; Pankhudi P; Beaulieu CF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 17895791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital bowel cleansing free colonic polyp detection method for fecal tagging CT colonography.
    Oda M; Kitasaka T; Mori K; Suenaga Y; Takayama T; Takabatake H; Mori M; Natori H; Nawano S
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
    Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.
    Guerrisi A; Marin D; Laghi A; Di Martino M; Iafrate F; Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2010 Aug; 115(5):758-70. PubMed ID: 20174880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polyp detection at CT colonography: inadequate primary 3D endoluminal reference standard precludes meaningful comparison.
    Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):316-7. PubMed ID: 17581913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance.
    Juchems MS; Ernst A; Johnson P; Virmani S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 18343970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
    Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.
    Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid segmentation of colon filled with air and opacified fluid for CT colonography.
    Franaszek M; Summers RM; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 16524091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colonic polyp segmentation in CT colonography-based on fuzzy clustering and deformable models.
    Yao J; Miller M; Franaszek M; Summers RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 15554123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
    Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Kim JY; Del Frate C; Magee C; Hahn PF
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15987967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
    Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
    Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Edge displacement field-based classification for improved detection of polyps in CT colonography.
    Acar B; Beaulieu CF; Göktürk SB; Tomasi C; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Napel S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 12588030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
    Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
    Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.