118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17896654)
1. Were women excluded from jury because of gender?
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Aug; 48(3):1. PubMed ID: 17896654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fear of cancer.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 15269009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Case Law Update: A review of recent rulings of interest to risk managers.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2010; 29(4):38-45. PubMed ID: 20419750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Under the microscope: doctors, lawyers, and melanocytic neoplasms.
Glusac EJ
J Cutan Pathol; 2003 May; 30(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 12753167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malpractice reform. Florida: round two.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 2007 Apr; 84(7):50, 53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 17494262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Power and Greed and the Corruptible Seed": Mental Disability, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and the Death Penalty.
Perlin ML
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Sep; 43(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 26438801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Final Verdict? Case Tests Court's Ability to Overturn a Jury Verdict.
Berlin J
Tex Med; 2019 Jun; 115(6):16-18. PubMed ID: 31260541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misdiagnosis at public clinic was malpractice, not negligence.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 May; 14(9):15. PubMed ID: 11366958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Italian Supreme Court has dismissed wrongful life claims.
Montanari Vergallo G; Busardò FP; Signore F; Napoletano S; Marinelli E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):60-61. PubMed ID: 26940486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CA: Did physician fail to diagnose stroke? Jury verdict for Dr. upheld by court on appeal.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Oct; 49(5):3. PubMed ID: 19004168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A differential diagnosis is key.
Klein CA
Nurse Pract; 2000 Jun; 25(6 Pt 1):98. PubMed ID: 10884999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Finds malpractice article slanted.
McGill LD; Grant WA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Jul; 225(1):28. PubMed ID: 15239459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of law determinations and the healthcare provider.
Regan J; Hamer G; Wright A; White C
Tenn Med; 2004 Apr; 97(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 15103975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A South Carolina jury tells managed care what quality means.
Bailey L
S C Nurse (1994); 1999; 6(2):9. PubMed ID: 14509007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court's influence on medicine and health: the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(13):1685-7. PubMed ID: 16204668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent Supreme Court decisions are important to physicians.
Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2007; 106(4):7. PubMed ID: 17710860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New York court rejects liability theory. Megally v. LaPorta.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Dec; 17(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 10724624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Court intervention in medical decisions and the generation of new conflicts].
Young P; Finn BC; Young DR
Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 18689163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
