These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17896654)

  • 21. Sex, death, and the courts: Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington; Quill v. Vacco; Romer v. Evans.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1996 Aug; 46(13):44-50. PubMed ID: 11656512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Supreme Court decisions improve malpractice environment.
    Schulte DJ
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2004 Nov; 86(11):20. PubMed ID: 15609819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2011/1 case of Korogodina v. Russia, 30 September 2010, no. 33512/04 (first section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2011 Jan; 18(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 21409975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court overturns optometrist's conviction for gross negligence manslaughter.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2017 Aug; 358():j3749. PubMed ID: 28774946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):W92-W93. PubMed ID: 29355404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Doctors, patients, and lawyers--two centuries of health law.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Aug; 367(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 22853015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [False interpretation of laboratory results. In court it counts as a "significant diagnostic error"].
    Schlund GH
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jun; 143(24):46-8. PubMed ID: 11469020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Doctor approved detention of unconscious man three hours before he died, court hears.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():e476. PubMed ID: 22252708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recent decisions by the Supreme Court are beneficial to physicians.
    Schulte DJ
    Mich Med; 2011; 110(5):3. PubMed ID: 22128504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Analysis of final judgements in cases of medical negligence occurred in Ukraine].
    Franchuk VV; Trach Rosolovska SV; Selskyy PR; Mykolenko AZ; Bodnar PY
    Wiad Lek; 2018; 71(3 pt 2):757-760. PubMed ID: 29783262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Diagnostic pitfall and diagnostic error from the malpractice viewpoint].
    Ostendorf GM
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):102. PubMed ID: 25000634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medicolegal--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Electronic health records and malpractice litigation: malpractice pitfalls.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W447-8. PubMed ID: 25247975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Missed breast cancer: the legal factors.
    Weir M
    J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 15957593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Making sausage: The Ninth Circuit's opinion.
    Schneider CE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 9017412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A national medical malpractice reform act (and why the Supreme Court may prefer to avoid it).
    Razook N
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 Feb; (322):9-36. PubMed ID: 16688930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 17715094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do the Supreme Court elections really matter?
    Jones RM
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 53(9):302-4. PubMed ID: 23167053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [From general practice of expert testimony: blood in stool always requires further diagnosis].
    Cyran W
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Aug; 87(8):673-7. PubMed ID: 8379206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.